期刊文献+

Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient(ADC) of Diffusion eighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Common Renal Disease Diagnosis

Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient(ADC) of Diffusion eighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Common Renal Disease Diagnosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective:To find the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of common renal diseases. Methods: There were 30 healthy subjects and 81 patients with renal lesions (56 cases of renal carcinoma, 18 lesions of 12 cases of renal angiomyolipomal and 21 lesions of 13 cases of renal cysts). Conventional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging were carried out. We measured the average ADC value of the renal lesions and normal kidneys. ADC maps from different b values were generated by a statistical package. Results: The ADC values of normal kidneys with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm^2) were 2.78 ± 0.14 × 10^-3mm^2s^-1, 2.45 ± 0.13 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 2.13 ± 0.14 × 10^-3mm^2s^-1, respectively. The ADC values of renal cell carcinoma with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm^2) were 1.63 ± 0.14 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 1.31 ± 0.18 × 10^3mm^2s^-, 1.07 ± 0.15 × 10^-3mm^2s^-1, respectively. Among the renal cell carcinoma, the ADC value of clear cell type were 1.67 ± 0.09 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 1.36 ± 0.13 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 1.15 ± 0.14 × 10^3mm^2s^-1,respectively; the ADC values of granular cell type were 1.59±0.19 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 1.25 ± 0.22 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 0.97 ± 0.12 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, respectively. The ADC values of renal angiomyolipoma with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800,1000 sec/mm^2) were 0.88 ± 0.08 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 0.63 ± 0.07 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 0.43 ± 0.04 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, respectively. The ADC values of renal cystic lesions with three different motionprobing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm^2) were 3.73 ± 0.18 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 3.44 ± 0.13 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 3.09± 0.21 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, respectively. Statistically significant differences exists between the ADC values of normal kidney, renal carcinomas, renal angiomyolipomas and renal cysts when the b value is the same. Among the different cell types of renal carcinomas, the ADC value of granular cell carcinoma is lower than that of clear cell carcinomas. Conclusion: It is of benefit in diagnosing and distinguishing between benign and malignant renal tumors to know the ADC values in diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, these values help to know the internal structure of the tumor and the tumor typel, which is helpful to the treatment and in predicting the patient' s prognosis. Objective:To find the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of common renal diseases. Methods: There were 30 healthy subjects and 81 patients with renal lesions (56 cases of renal carcinoma, 18 lesions of 12 cases of renal angiomyolipomal and 21 lesions of 13 cases of renal cysts). Conventional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging were carried out. We measured the average ADC value of the renal lesions and normal kidneys. ADC maps from different b values were generated by a statistical package. Results: The ADC values of normal kidneys with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm^2) were 2.78 ± 0.14 × 10^-3mm^2s^-1, 2.45 ± 0.13 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 2.13 ± 0.14 × 10^-3mm^2s^-1, respectively. The ADC values of renal cell carcinoma with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm^2) were 1.63 ± 0.14 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 1.31 ± 0.18 × 10^3mm^2s^-, 1.07 ± 0.15 × 10^-3mm^2s^-1, respectively. Among the renal cell carcinoma, the ADC value of clear cell type were 1.67 ± 0.09 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 1.36 ± 0.13 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 1.15 ± 0.14 × 10^3mm^2s^-1,respectively; the ADC values of granular cell type were 1.59±0.19 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 1.25 ± 0.22 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 0.97 ± 0.12 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, respectively. The ADC values of renal angiomyolipoma with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800,1000 sec/mm^2) were 0.88 ± 0.08 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 0.63 ± 0.07 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 0.43 ± 0.04 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, respectively. The ADC values of renal cystic lesions with three different motionprobing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm^2) were 3.73 ± 0.18 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 3.44 ± 0.13 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, 3.09± 0.21 × 10^3mm^2s^-1, respectively. Statistically significant differences exists between the ADC values of normal kidney, renal carcinomas, renal angiomyolipomas and renal cysts when the b value is the same. Among the different cell types of renal carcinomas, the ADC value of granular cell carcinoma is lower than that of clear cell carcinomas. Conclusion: It is of benefit in diagnosing and distinguishing between benign and malignant renal tumors to know the ADC values in diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, these values help to know the internal structure of the tumor and the tumor typel, which is helpful to the treatment and in predicting the patient' s prognosis.
出处 《Journal of Nanjing Medical University》 2008年第6期362-365,共4页 南京医科大学学报(英文版)
关键词 Diffusion weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient renal cell carcinoma renal angiomyolipoma Renal cyst Diffusion weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient renal cell carcinoma renal angiomyolipoma Renal cyst
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1G. Manenti,M. Roma,S. Mancino,D. A. Bartolucci,G. Palmieri,R. Mastrangeli,R. Miano,E. Squillaci,G. Simonetti.Malignant renal neoplasms: correlation between ADC values and cellularity in diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T[J].La radiologia medica.2008(2)
  • 2Enzinger C,,Thimary F,Kapeller P,Ropele S,Schmidt R,EbnerF, et al.Transient global amnesia: diffusion-weighted imag- ing lesions and cerebrovascular disease[].Stroke.2008
  • 3Obenaus A,Ashwal S.Magnetic resonance imaging in cere-bral ischemia: Focus on neonates[].Neuropharmacology.2008
  • 4Kitajima K,Kaji Y,Kuroda K,Sugimura K.High b-value diffusion- weighted imaging in normal and malignant peripheral zone tissue of the prostate: effect of signal-to-noise ratio[].Magn Reson Med Sci.2008
  • 5Youn BJ,Chung JW,Son KR,Kim HC,Jae HJ,Lee JM,et al.Diffusion-weighted MR: therapeutic evaluation after chemoembolization of VX-2 carcinoma implanted in rabbit liver[].Academic Radiology.2008
  • 6Tai-fu Gu,Xin-lan Xiao,Fei Sun,Jian-hua Yin,Hai Zhao.DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF WHOLE BODY DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING FOR SCREENING PRIMARY TUMORS OF PATIENTS WITH METASTASES[J].Chinese Medical Sciences Journal,2008,23(3):145-150. 被引量:9
  • 7Manenti G,Di Roma M,Mancino S,Bartolucci DA,Palmieri G,Mastrangeli R,et al.Malignant renal neoplasms: correlation between ADC values and cellularity in diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T[].Radiologia Medica.2008
  • 8Zhang J,Tehrani YM,Wang L,Ishill NM,Schwartz LH,Hricak H.Renal masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging-a preliminary experience[].Radiol.2008
  • 9Pedrosa I,Sun MR,Spencer M,Genega EM,Olumi AF,Dewolf WC, et al.MR imaging of renal masses: correlation with find-ings at surgery and pathologic analysis[].Radiographics.2008
  • 10Warach,S,Chien,D,Li,W,Ronthal,M,Edelman,RR.Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke[].Neurology.1992

二级参考文献3

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部