期刊文献+

组织培养药敏法在表浅膀胱癌个体化化疗的应用 被引量:2

Application of histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) in individual chemotherapy for bladder cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究组织培养药敏法在表浅膀胱癌个体化化疗中的意义。方法:用组织培养药敏法检测药物敏感性,选择一种最敏感药物对39例表浅膀胱癌患者术后膀胱灌注化疗,与按经验给药的42例表浅膀胱癌患者对比研究,所有患者随访6~24个月。结果:不同化疗药物对不同个体膀胱癌的抑制率差异明显。39例按药敏结果选择最佳化疗药物的表浅膀胱癌患者,8例(20.5%)复发,而按经验给药42例患者,20例(47.6%)复发,复发率前者显著低于后者(P<0.05,χ2检验)。结论:用Hoffman式组织培养药敏法选择最合适的药物对术后膀胱癌进行化疗,可以明显提高表浅膀胱癌术后的治疗效果,实现表浅膀胱癌的个体化膀胱灌注化疗。 Objective: To study the significance of histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) in individual chemotherapy for bladder cancer. Methods:Sensitivity to chemotherapy drug was determined by HDRA, the most optimal drug was used for intravesical chemotherapy of 39 cases with postoperative superficial bladder cancer, and previous 42 cases with postoperative superficial bladder cancer were given intravesical chemotherapy drug by empiricism, then we compared with tumor recurrence of two groups. All of patients had a following-up time for 6-24 months. Results:In different individual patients, the inhibition rate of each drug was obviously discrepant. 39 cases with superficial bladder cancer underwent intravesical chemotherapy by I-IDRA, 8 cases (20.5%) had recurrent tumor, then 20(47.6 %) of 42 cases with intravesical chemotherapy by empiricism had recurrent tumor, the recurrent rate of the former was significantly low than the later(P〈0.05,X^2 test). Conclusions: HDRA could be used to choose the optimal drug for chemotherapy of postoperative patients with superficial bladder cancer, which could increase the treatment effects obviously, different patients with superficial bladder cancer could be given individual intravesical chemotherapy by HDRA.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2008年第11期854-856,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 组织培养药敏法 表浅膀胱癌 个体化化疗 Histoculture drug response assays Superficial bladder cancers Individual chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Suda S, Akiyama S, Sekiguehi H, et al. Evaluation of the histocutture drug response assay as a sensitivity test for anticancer agents[J]. Surg Today. 2002,32(6) :477 -481
  • 2Singh B, Li R, Xu L, et al. Prediction of survival in patients with head and neck cancer using the histoculture drug response assay[J]. Head Neck. 2002 May;24 (5) :437-442.
  • 3龙清志,鲁功成,周辉良,李俊,曾汉青.不同个体膀胱癌组织培养化疗药物敏感性的研究[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2004,19(7):423-425. 被引量:4
  • 4Yasuhisa Hasegawa, Mitsuo Goto, Nobuhiro Hunai, et al. Evaluation of optimal drug concentration in histoculture drug response assay in association with clinical efficacy for head and neck cancer[J].Oral oncology,2006, 9:1-8.
  • 5Hirano Y, Ushiyama T, Suzuki K,et al. Clinical application of an in vitro chemosensitivity test, the Histoculture Drug Response Assay, to urological cancers: wide distribution of inhibition rates in bladder cancer and renal cell cancer[J]. Urol Res,1999,27(6):483-488.
  • 6Clifford S C, Neal D E, Lunec J. High level expression of the multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene in the normal bladder urothelium: a potential involvement in protection against carcinogens [ J ] ? Carcinogenesis, 1996, 17 (3) :601-604.
  • 7Bohle A, Jocham D, Book P R. Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin versus mitomycin C for superficial bladder cancer: a formal meta analysis of comparative studies on recurrence and toxicity[J]. J Urol, 2003,169 (1) :90-95.
  • 8Lynn N N, Howe M C, Hale R J, et al. Over expression of metallothionein predicts resistance of transitional cell carcinoma of bladder to intravesical mitomycin therapy[J]. J Urol, 2003,!69(2) :721-723.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Sakurai T, Tanino H, Oura S, et al. Efficacy of docetaxel for recurrent breast cancer: evaluation based on chemosensitivity test and clinical response. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2000, 27: 423-427.
  • 2Tanino H, Oura S, Hoffman R M, et al. Acquisition of multidrug resistance in recurrent breast cancer demonstrated by the histocultuce drug response assay. Anticancer Res, 2001, 21: 4083-4083.
  • 3Hirano Y, Kageyama S. Ushiyama T, et al. Clinical usefulness of chemotherapy based on an in vitro chemosensitivity test in urothelial cancer patients. Anticancer Res, 2001, 21: 4061-4)66.
  • 4Suda S, Akiyama S, Sekiguchi H, et al. Evaluation of the histoculture drug response assay as a sensitivity test for anticancer agents. Surg Today, 2002, 32: 477-481.
  • 5Furukawa T, Kubota T, Hoffman R M. Clinical applications of the histoculture drug response assay. Clin Cancer Res, 1995, 1: 305-311.
  • 6Hirano Y, Ushiyama T, Suzuki K,et al. Clinical application of an in vitro chemosensitivity test, the Histoculture Drug Response Assay, to urological cancers: wide distribution of inhibition rates in bladder cancer and renal cell cancer. UrolRes, 1999, 27: 483-488.

共引文献3

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部