期刊文献+

证券交易信息的属性与产权归属 被引量:4

The Characters and Property Rights of Securities Trading Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据公共物品理论,证券交易信息是介于公共物品与私人物品之间的俱乐部物品,具有消费的非竞争性和受益的非排他性。因此,将所有信息均质的认定为公共物品,主张将交易信息纳入公共领域的观点是不能成立的。明确交易信息的产权归属是保障信息安全,有效应对信息侵权的前提和基础。赋予证券交易所享有交易信息的产权,不仅符合效率的原则,也是我国证券法的应有之义。 According to the public goods theory, stock quotes fall into the category of club goods which are between public goods and private goods. Stock quotes are characterized by non-rivalness and excludability. The proposition that all information is public goods and securities trading information falls into the public domain is untenable. Defining the property rights of securities trading information is a prerequisite to ensure information security and to guard against information tort. Securities stock exchanges being entitled to stock quotes not only is efficient but also should be made an integral part of China's Securities Law.
作者 曲冬梅
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期123-129,共7页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 公共物品 俱乐部物品 交易信息 产权归属 public goods club goods stock quotes property rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1《证券法》第113条.
  • 2[日]中山信弘.《多媒体与著作权》.北京:专利文献出版社,1997年,第37页.
  • 3罗伯特·考特,托马斯.尤伦.《法和经济学》.张军等译,上海:上海人民出版社,1994年,第109页.
  • 4洪银兴,路瑶.信息产品交易和知识产权保护[J].学术月刊,2005,37(5):33-41. 被引量:4
  • 5Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics. ol. 36. pp387.
  • 6周自强.公共物品概念的延伸及其政策含义[J].经济学动态,2005(9):25-28. 被引量:27
  • 7郑秉文.公共物品、公共选择理论中的教育[J].世界经济与政治,2002(12):73-78. 被引量:22
  • 8Board of Tade v. Christie Grain & Stock Co. ,198 U. S. 236 (1905).
  • 9Samuelson, P. 1955. Diagramatic exposition of a theory of public expenditures. Review of Economics and Statistics 37:pp350-356.
  • 10Buchanan,J. M. 1965. An economic theory of clubs. Economiea, New Series, Vol 32, No. 125 February. pp1-14.

二级参考文献42

  • 1Atkinson, A.B. , (1970), On the measurement of inequality, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 2 Issue 3,p. 244.
  • 22Coriat, Benjamin and Fabienne Orsi (2002), Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States : Origins, content and problems, Research Policy, vol. 31 Issue 8/9, p. 1491.
  • 3Ganguli, Prabuddha (2000), Intellectual property rights : Imperatives for the knowledge industry, World Patent Information, vol. 22 Issue 3, p. 167.
  • 4Helpman, Elhanan (1992), Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights, NBER Working Papers Series No. 4081.
  • 5Husted, Bryan W. , (2000), The impact of national culture on software piracy, Journal of Business Ethnics, vol. 26 Issue 3, p. 197.
  • 6Laffont, Jean-Jacques and Jean Tirole (1986), Using cost observation to regulate firms, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94 Issue 3, p. 614.
  • 7Lea, Gary and Peter Hall (2004), Standards and intellectual property rights : an economic and legal perspective, Information Economics and Poficy, vol. 16 Issue 1, p. 67.
  • 8Machlup, Fritz and Edith Penrose (1950), Thepatent controversy in the nineteenth century, Journal of Economic History, vol. 10 Issue 1, p. 20.
  • 9Nordhaus, William D. (1969), An economic theory of technological change, American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 59, p. 18.
  • 10Saint-Paul, Gilles (2004), Are intellectual property rights unfair?, Labour Economics vol. 11 Issue 1, p.129.

共引文献311

同被引文献112

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部