摘要
中国文学批评史中的"虚实"范畴源自老庄"有无"论,《周易》和《老子》赋予其深刻的辩证思维,这些是先秦时期虚实产生的哲学根基,也为虚实在魏晋和唐宋的发展与演进奠定了基础。这期间虚实内涵的推进离不开先秦《诗》《骚》及散文创作的铺垫与实践。虚实作为中国文学批评史上一个核心的元范畴,从根本上来说是一项艺术创作手法,自古既有其萌芽,先秦时期文学创作中的比兴、象征、具象等手法是其不自觉的运用。从哲学的高度来看,文艺虚实结合具有必然性。《诗》《骚》中的比兴、象征手法是后世"虚实"的"隐形"替代和早期"胚胎"。"虚实"产生前后与秦汉政论说理文及汉赋具有一定的关系。
In the history of Chinese literary criticism, the category of void and reality has been originated from the theory of ＂Existence and Nothingness＂ by ＂Lao Tzu＂ and Zhuang Tzu. And the works of ＂Zhou Yi＂ and ＂Lao Tzu＂ endow it with profound dialectical thoughts. These have become the philosophical basis for the emergence of ＂Void and Reality＂ theory during the Pre-Qin period, and have also established a basis for its further development and evolution in Wei and Jin dynasties, and consequently in Tang and Song dynasties. Its implication can＇ t be separated from prose practice during this period, such as The book of ＂The Book of Odes＂, ＂Li Sao＂, and so on. As a kernel primary category in Chinese history of literary criticism, ＂Void and Reality＂ is fundamentally an artistic creation method whose germ existed in ancient times. During the Pre-Qin period, trope, symbolism, and concrete images are its unconscious use in literature creation. From the perspective of philosophy, the combination of Void and Reality is inevitable. The trope and symbolism methods found in ＂The Book of Odes＂ and ＂Li Sao＂ are the invisible substitute and earlier ＂embryo＂ of the ＂Void and Reality＂ theory in later generations. The emergence of ＂Void and Reality＂ has certain relationship with the political argumentations in Qin and Hart dynasties and with the poetic essays in Han Dynasty.
出处
《太原师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2008年第6期85-91,共7页
Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition
关键词
诗经
离骚
虚实
有无
比兴
象征
创作
关系
The Book of Odes
Li Sao
＂Void and Reality＂
＂Existence and Nothingness＂
trope
symbolism
literary creation
relation
