期刊文献+

磁共振弥散张量成像观察创伤性胼胝体损伤 被引量:7

Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in traumatic corpus callosum injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨磁共振弥散张量成像对胼胝体损伤的潜在诊断价值。方法应用磁共振弥散张量成像技术对25例闭合性颅脑损伤患者及20例健康志愿者进行观察,对胼胝体膝部、压部进行定量测定FA及ADC值,测定结果与患者组GCS进行相关分析。结果患者组胼胝体膝部及压部的FA值较对照组显著下降(P<0.05)。患者组与对照组所测胼胝体ADC值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。患者组胼胝体FA值与GCS呈显著相关(P<0.05)。结论磁共振弥散张量成像技术能清晰显示并定量与临床GCS评分密切相关的胼胝体损伤,为临床诊断及治疗提供有价值的更深层次的信息。 Objective To evaluate the potential clinical role for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in patients with traumatic corpus callosum injury. Methods Twenty-five closed traumatic brain injury patients (16 male, 9 female; age 20--60, mean age 37) were evaluated by DTI with MR system. Quantitive analysis was performed using measurements of fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the genu and splenium of corpus callosum. The measurements were correlated with the clinical Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and the outcomes were compared with those of 20 healthy subjects (12 male, 8 female; age 21--60, mean age 36). Results FA values of patient group significantly reduced within the genu and splenium of corpus callosum (P〈0.05), compared with the control group. There was no significant difference of ADC measurements between control and patient group (P〉0.05). FA values of corpus callosum (P〈0.05) were significantly correlated with the GCS. Conclusion DTI reveals the diffuse axonal injury change of corpus callosum correlated with the clinical GCS, being able to provide valuable further information to traumatic brain injury cases.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第11期1715-1717,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 磁共振成像 弥漫性轴索损伤 弥散张量成像 Magnetic resonance imaging Diffuse axonal injury Diffusion tensor imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Schaefer PW, Huisman TA, Sorensen AG, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in closed head injury: high correlation with initial glasgow coma scale score and score on modified Rankin scale at discharge. Radiology, 2004,233(1) : 58-66.
  • 2Koponen S, Taiminen T, Honkalampi K, et al. Alexithymia after traumatic brain injury: its relation to magnetic resonance imaging findings and psychiatric disorders. Psychosom Med, 2005,67(5) : 807-812.
  • 3Gentry L R. Imaging of closed head injury. Radiology, 1994, 191 (1):1-17.
  • 4Rugg Gunn FJ, Symms MR, Barker GJ, et al. Diffusion imaging shows abnormalities after blunt head trauma when conventional magnetic resonance imaging is normal. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2001,70(4) :530-533.
  • 5王双坤,戴建平,马军,李少武,艾林,程华.磁共振弥散张量成像对弥漫性轴索损伤的研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(12):1799-1801. 被引量:25
  • 6Ducreux D, Huynh I, Fillard P, et al. Brain MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking to differentiate between two diffuse axonal injuries. Neuroradiology, 2005,47(8) :604-608.
  • 7Szeszko PR, Vogel J, Ashtari M, et al. Sex differences in frontal lobe white matter microstructure: a DTI study. Neuroreport, 2003,14(18) :2469 2473.
  • 8Takayama H, Kobayashi M, Sugishita M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging demonstrates transient cytotoxic edema involving the corpus callosum in a patient with diffuse brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2000,102(3) :135-139.
  • 9Huisman TA, Scwamm LH, Schaefer PW, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury. Am J Neuroradiol, 2004,25(3) :370-376.
  • 10于春水,李坤成,李永忠,梁志刚,秦文,刘嘉宾.人脑连合纤维的弥散张量纤维束成像[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(3):378-380. 被引量:20

二级参考文献16

  • 1[1]Melhem ER, Mori S, Mukundan G, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain and white matter tractography[J]. AJR, 2002, 178(1):3-16.
  • 2[3]Everett NB. Functional neuroanatomy[M]. 6th ed. Washington: Henry Kimpton,1971.
  • 3[4]Catani M, Howard RJ, Pajevic S, et al.Virtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain[J]. Neuroimage, 2002, 17(1):77-94.
  • 4[5]Hagmann P, Thiran JP, Jonasson L, et al. DTI mapping of human brain connectivity: statistical fibre tracking and virtual dissection[J]. Neuroimage, 2003, 19(3):545-554.
  • 5[6]Lazar M, Weinstein DM, Tsuruda JS, et al. White matter tractography using diffusion tensor deflection[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2003, 18(4):306-321.
  • 6[7]Jones DK, Horsfield MA, Simmons A. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Magn Reson Med, 1999, 42(3): 515-525.
  • 7[8]Hasan KM, Parker DL, Alexander AL. Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion-tensor MRI[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2001, 13(5):769-780.
  • 8Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI [J]. J Magn Reson B, 1996,111(3) :209-219.
  • 9Pierpaoli C, Basser PJ. Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy[J]. Magn Reson Med, 1996,36(6):893-906.
  • 10Huisman TA, Schwamm LH, Schaefer PW, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury[J]. AJNR, 2004,25(3) :370-376.

共引文献43

同被引文献55

引证文献7

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部