期刊文献+

环境美学视野中的山水城市理念 被引量:3

Ideas of landscape City Under the Field of View of Environmental Aesthetics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从阐述宜居城市的内涵出发,提出乐居是宜居的最高境界,并进而在此基础上,透过环境美学的视野,分析了山水城市理念与城市乐居追求的内在关联,指出环境美学试图营造的让人乐居的理想居住环境,实际上与山水城市的理念殊途同归. This article points out that happy habitation is the highest state of livable from the starting point of telling what is the livable city. Under this basis, this article analyzes the inherent correlation between the landscape city and the livable city from the field of view of environmental aesthetics. This article indicates the idea of happy habitation defined by environmental aesthetics actually has the same goal with the idea of landscape city.
作者 秦红岭
出处 《北京建筑工程学院学报》 2008年第4期5-8,21,共5页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Civil Engineering and Architecture
基金 北京市属市管高等学校人才强教计划资助项目(2006BAZX017)
关键词 环境美学 山水城市 宜居城市 environmental aesthetics landscape city livable city
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1理查德·罗杰斯.小小地球上的城市[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2004.
  • 2约·瑟帕玛.环境之美[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社.2006:206
  • 3陈望衡.环境美学[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2007.
  • 4阿诺德·伯林特.环境美学[M].张敏(译).长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2006.
  • 5鲍世行,顾孟潮.杰出科学家钱学森论城市学与山水城市[C].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1996
  • 6李允鉌.华夏意匠[M].天津:天津大学出版社,2005.5.
  • 7海德格尔.荷尔德林诗的阐释[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000..
  • 8阿诺德·伯林特.环境与艺术:环境美学的多维视角[M].刘悦笛,等译.重庆:重庆出版社,2007:167-168
  • 9凯文·林奇.城市形态[M].北京:华夏出版社,2002.
  • 10约翰.弗里德曼,王红扬,钱慧.美好城市:为乌托邦式的思考辩护[J].国外城市规划,2005,20(5):21-27. 被引量:15

二级参考文献25

  • 1Abers, Rebecca. 2000. Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil.Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.
  • 2Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 3Brook, Timothy, and B. Michael Frolic, eds. 1997. Civil Society in China.Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  • 4Cheng, Lucie, and Chu-joe Hsia. 1999. “Exploring Territorial Governance and Transterritorial Society: Alternative Visions of 21 st Century Taiwan.” In John Friedmann, ed-, The Governance of Urban Regions in the Asia Pacific. Vancouver: Institute of Asian Research, University of British Columbia.
  • 5Eisenstadt, S. N. 1998. “World Histories and Construction of Collective Identities.” In Philip Pomper, Richard Elphick, and Richard T. Vann, eds., Worm History: Ideologies, Structures, Identities. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 6Fainstein, Susan S. 1999. “Can We Make the Cities We Want?” In Sophie Body- Gendrot and Robert A. Beauregard, eds., The Urban Moment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Salve.
  • 7Forester, John. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner. Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
  • 8Friedmann and Clyde Weaver. 1979. Territory and Function: The Evolution of Regional Planning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • 9Friedmann. 1973a. RetrackingAmerica: A Theory of Transactive Planning. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor.
  • 10Friedmann. 1979. The Good Society: A Personal Account of Its Struggle with the Worm of Social Planning and a Dialectical Inquiry into the Roots of Radical Practice. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

共引文献251

同被引文献9

  • 1周丽亚,邹兵.探讨多层次控制城市密度的技术方法——《深圳经济特区密度分区研究》的主要思路[J].城市规划,2004,28(12):28-32. 被引量:40
  • 2林仲煜,胡纹,金伟.中国可持续城市形态构建研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2006,12(4):18-22. 被引量:9
  • 32008中国乐居城市揭晓,“乐居”成为城市品牌新名片[EB/OL].http://www.leiu.com/ads/news_23.html.
  • 4城市-我们的家[EB/OL].http://202.107.212.146/homepage/specia1ty/tyjt/mj_1_1.php?id=1218503658&theme=626&uptheme=true.
  • 5王晓宏,孟海龙,王英.“乐居理念”与吴江实践[N].苏州日报,2009-08-07(A01).
  • 6庾康等.“乐居吴江”,踩准发展兴奋点[N].新华日报,2009-08-03(A01).
  • 7新浪乐居地产[EB/OL].http://bi.house.sina.com.cn/focus/msli/index.html.
  • 8王铁军.探究多元化的新型宜居社区-对我国住宅小区的思考[D].东北师范大学,2009.
  • 9邓赵君.传统民居聚居形态向现代城市住宅空间的演变[M].武汉:武汉理工大学,2006.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部