期刊文献+

一种有效的加权冲突证据组合方法 被引量:5

An Efficient Combination Approach of Conflict Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了有效融合高度冲突的证据,提高证据高度冲突时融合结果的可靠性和合理性,给出了一种新的加权证据组合方法。该方法根据证据之间的关联特性,通过计算证据体间的相对距离获得系统中各传感器证据的权重。首先引入一个证据体间的距离函数,根据多证据体的距离,得到系统中各传感器证据体之间的相似度和各证据的支持度,依据支持度的大小进一步可得到各证据的可信度,以此作为各证据的权重,对证据的基本概率指派进行加权平均,最后利用Dempster组合规则融合加权平均后的证据。与其他方法相比,该方法在系统存在伪证据(干扰)时能有效迅速地识别出目标。 In order to efficiently combine high conflict evidence and improve the reliability and rationality of the combining results when evidences are in high conflict, a new method of weighted evidence combination rule is proposed. In adopting this proposed approach, according to the associated characteristic between evidences, the weight of evidence in sensor system is acquired by calculating the relative distance in body of evidence. First, a distance function between the bodies of evidences is introduced. According to the bodies of evidences, the similar degree between the bodies of evidences from different sensors and the support degree of each evidence are gained. Then the reliability of each evidence can be got from the support degree, with this as the weight of each evidence in weight - averaging the basic probability assignment. Finally the fusion of the weight - averaged evidences is performed with the Dempster combination rule. Compared with the existing methods, the proposed approach is more efficient and rapid in recognizing the target when false evidence is in existence.
出处 《空军工程大学学报(自然科学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期57-61,共5页 Journal of Air Force Engineering University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60773209)
关键词 证据理论 组合规则 冲突证据 目标识别 evidence theory combination rule conflict evidence target recognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Dempster A P. Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by A Multi -valued Mapping[ J ]. Annual of Mathematical Statistics, 1967,38(4) :325 -339.
  • 2Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence [ M]. Princeton, :Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 3Yang J B, Singh M G. An Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple - attributed Decision Making with Uncertainty[ J ]. IEEE Transaction on System, Man and Cybernetics, 1994, 24(1) :1 -18.
  • 4Yang J, Sen P. A General Multilevel Evaluation Process for Hybrid MADM with Uncertainty[ J ]. IEEE Transaction on System, Man and Cybernetics, 1994, 24(10) :1458 -1473.
  • 5Walley P. Measure of Uncertainty in Expert System[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1996,83 (1) :1 -58.
  • 6Zadeh L. A Simple View of the Dempster - Shafer Theory of Evidence and Its Implication for the Rule of Combination [ J ]. Aitificial Intelligence, 1956,7 ( 1 ) : 85 - 90.
  • 7Yager R R . On the Dempster - Sharer Framework and New Combination Rules [ J ]. Information System, 1989,41 ( 2 ) : 93 - 137.
  • 8Murphy C K. Combining Belief Functions When Evidence Conflicts[ J]. Decision Support Systems ,2000,29 (2) : 1 - 9.
  • 9Dubois D, Prade H. Representation and Combination of Uncertainty with Belief Functions and Possibility Measures [ J]. Computational Intelligence, 1998 (4) : 244 - 264.
  • 10孙全,叶秀清,顾伟康.一种新的基于证据理论的合成公式[J].电子学报,2000,28(8):116-119. 被引量:442

二级参考文献28

  • 1[1]Ronald R.Yager.On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules[J].Information Sciences,1987,41:93-137.
  • 2[2]G.Shafer.A mathematical theory of evidence[M].Princeton U.P.,Princeton,1976.
  • 3[3]A.P.Dempster.Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping[J].Ann.Math.Statist.1967,38:325-339.
  • 4Dempster A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping [J]. Ann Math Statist, 1967, 38:325-339.
  • 5Shafer G. A mathematical theory of evidence [M].Princeton N J: Princeton U. P. , 1976.
  • 6Yang J B, Singh M G. An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attributed decision making with uncertainty [J]. IEEE Trans on System, Man and Cybernetics, 1994, 24(1):1-18.
  • 7Yang J, Sen P. A general multilevel evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty [J]. IEEE Trans on System, Man and Cybernetics, 1994, 24(10) :1458- 1473.
  • 8Drukopoulos E, Hsia Y T, Smets P. Transferable belief model for decision making in the evaluation based systems [J]. IEEE Trans on System, Man and Cybernetics, 1996, 26(1):698-712.
  • 9Walley P. Measure of uncertainty in expert system[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1996, 83 (1) : 1 - 58.
  • 10Zadeh L. A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination [J]. AI Mag, 1986, 7(1):85-90.

共引文献518

同被引文献38

  • 1邢清华,雷英杰,刘付显.一种按比例分配冲突度的证据推理组合规则[J].控制与决策,2004,19(12):1387-1390. 被引量:42
  • 2曾成,赵保军,何佩琨.不完备识别框架下的证据组合方法[J].电子与信息学报,2005,27(7):1043-1046. 被引量:15
  • 3刘婷婷,韩玉启,李新.关于层次分析法(AHP)的应用[J].机械管理开发,2006,21(5):68-68. 被引量:13
  • 4[2]Zadeh L A.A simple view of the dempster-shafer theory of evidence find its implication for the rule of combinatian[J].AI Mag.,1986,7(2),85-90.
  • 5[6]Smets P.The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model[J].IEEE Trans.Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,1990,12 (5):447-458.
  • 6[7]Lefuevre E,Colot O,Vannoorenberghe P.Belief function combination and conflict manage ment[J].Information fusion,2002,3 (2):149-162.
  • 7[8]Daniel M.Associatively in combination of belief functions; a derivation of mine combination[J].Soft Computing,2003,7(5):196-288.
  • 8[9]Liu W.Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions[J].Artificial Intelligence,2006,170 (11):909-924.
  • 9路艳丽,雷英杰,李兆渊.一种D-S证据推理的BPA获取方法[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2007,8(3):39-42. 被引量:7
  • 10Tetsuya Murai, Yasuo Kudo, Yoshiharu Sato. Association rules and dempster-shafer theory of evidence. DS 2003, LNAI 2843, 2003: 377-384.

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部