摘要
文章采用案例分析的方法,从道德争议与伦理两难的角度,系统地分析了当今中国官员"为民做主"观念的成因及其在当代中国适用时遇到的"正当性"争议,以及行动者(官员与民众)在面临是否选择"为民做主"时的两难处境。通过争议性对话与实证性分析,文章指出,文化观念、民众心理、意识形态、权力观念与结构、干部绩效考核模式等多重原因,致使"为民做主"这一历史观念至今仍被许多官员所奉行。然而,当决定是否支持或遵行"为民做主"时,政府官员面临着"信念伦理"与"责任伦理"的两难决策;民众面临着"(经济)好处"与"(生产自由)权利"的两难抉择。
Through study of typical cases, the article systematically analyzes the whys and wherefores of contemporary officials＇ idea of ＇Taking Responsibilities for the People＇. The author argues that it resulted from Chinese culture, popular psychology, political ideology, concept and structure of public power, evaluation institution of officials＇ merits and achievements and so on. However, some decision dilemmas and ethical controversies will be eonfronted by this kind of practice, ＇ethic of conviction vs. ethic of responsibility＇ for the officials., and ＇goods vs. rights＇ for the public.
出处
《同济大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2008年第6期79-85,107,共8页
Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基金
国家社科基金项目<公共行政中的道德悖论与伦理困境:案例研究>(03CZZ007)的中期成果之一
关键词
为民做主
道德争议
两难困境
taking responsibilities for the people
moral controversy
dilemma
