期刊文献+

多元体育学习评价对中小学生体育学习兴趣的影响 被引量:32

Effects of multi-elemental physical education learning evaluation on the physical education learning interest of elementary and middle school students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对青岛、东莞、重庆、泉州、厦门和蚌埠等实验基地的小学、初中、高中共6所学校进行实验研究。结果显示,不论是课改实验区还是非课改实验区,多元体育学习评价均能有效地激发中小学生的体育学习兴趣,引导学生学会体育学习,激励其不断进步与发展;在提高学生的体育学习兴趣方面,多元体育学习评价运用的效果课改实验区明显好于非课改实验区;多元体育学习评价对于不同学段和不同性别学生的体育学习兴趣会产生不同的影响,建议在下一步的体育学习评价改革中给予高中生和初中女生更多的关注。 The authors made an experimental study on totally 6 schools, including 2 elementary schools, 2 middle schools and 2 high schools, in experimental bases in Qingdao, Dongguan, Chongqing, Quanzhou, Xiamen and Bangbu, and revealed the following findings: no matter in the curriculum reform area or in the non curriculum re- form area, multi-elemental physical education learning evaluation can effectively arouse the physical education learning interest of elementary and middle school students, and guide them to learn about sports, and inspire them to make progress and development constantly; in terms of promoting the physical education learning interest of students, multi-elemental physical education learning evaluation will produce different effects on the physical education learning interest of students at different learning sections and with different genders. The authors proposed to pay more attention to high school students and female middle school students in further reform of physical education learning evaluation.
出处 《体育学刊》 CAS CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第12期52-58,共7页 Journal of Physical Education
基金 全国教育科学"十一五"规划教育部重点课题(ELA060226) "985"体育教师教育理论与实践创新项目成果
关键词 学校体育 多元体育学习评价 体育学习兴趣 中小学生 school physical education multi-elemental physical education learning evaluation physical education learning interest elementary and middle school students
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献39

  • 1[1]陈琦,刘儒德.当代教育心理学[Z].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1997.
  • 2[4]赵增梅.大学生评价教师教学效果的多维性研究[Z].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1999.
  • 3[5]Marsh, H. W. & Dunkin. M. J. ( 1992). Students' evaluation of university teaching: a multidimensional perspective, in: J.C. SMART(ED). Higher Education: handbook of research and practice, Vol. 8 ( New York, Agathon Press).
  • 4[6]Kulik, J. , &McKeachile. M. ( 1975 ). The evaluation of teachers in higher education, In F. N. Kerlinger ( Ed), Review of research in education ( pp. 210 - 40). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
  • 5Coheran-smith M.Constructing outcomes in teacher education:Policy,practice and pitfalls[J].Education Policy Analysis Archives,2001,9:11-35.
  • 6Sandholtz J H,Ogawa R T,Scribner S P.Standards gaps:Unintended consequences of local standards-based reform[J].Teacher College Record,2004,106(6):1177-1202.
  • 7Berger J.Does top-down standards-based reform work? A review of the status of statewide standards-based reform[J].NASSP Bulletin,2000,84(612):57-65.
  • 8Burseun N,Kretschmer D,Smith C,et al.Redesigning teacher education as a shared responsibility of schools and universities[J].J Teacher Education,1999,50:106-118.
  • 9Collier C S.Oslin J.Achieving competency and proficiency in physical education[J].J Physical Education,Recreation & Dance,2001,72(8):20-22.
  • 10Thomas P T.Using standards to make a difference:Four options[J].Educational Horizons,1997,75:121-125.

共引文献33

同被引文献149

引证文献32

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部