期刊文献+

中国六城市休闲制约因素研究——以民族志学的方法 被引量:9

An Ethnographic Analysis of Leisure Constraints in Six Chinese Cities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在中国六城市中,基于研究对象的自主重要性,可以把休闲制约因素分成相对清晰的八种类型。而且,较之于社会心理学抽象地把休闲制约因素分为诸如"个体内部的"或"结构的"等制约因素,以民族志学的方法所提供的休闲制约因素对各级政府官员和休闲服务行业更有价值。今后更多的研究应该需要清楚地把休闲制约因素重新分类,即基于研究样本所提供的信息(民族志学法)而不是被研究者强加(社会心理学法)去分类休闲制约因素。 This study is to provide a preliminary ethnography of the domain of leisure constraints as perceived by the residents of six large cities in China. Our ethnographic approach to the study of leisure constraints differs from the social psychological one most commonly used in North America. We find that informants in six large Chinese cities group leisure constraints, based on their perceived importance, into eight, relatively distinct, types. Moreover, we believe that the kind of information about leisure constraints that we have provided in this paper is much more useful to both government officials and leisure service psychological approach, in which leisure believe that more research is clearly need is, based on information provided from providers than abstract classifications provided by the social constraints are categorized as "intrapersonal" or "structural". We led on classifying leisure constraints from the "bottom-up", that informants (ethnographic approaches) rather than imposed by researchers (social psychological approaches).
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期31-42,共12页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
关键词 休闲活动 休闲制约因素 自由列举 民族志学 中国 leisure activities leisure constraints free listing ethnography China
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1C. Rojek, Leisure and Culture, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.
  • 2G. Chick, “Leisure, Labor, and the Complexity of Culture: An Anthropological Perspective,”Journal of Leisure Research , Vol. 18, No. 3(1986) ,pp. 154 - 168.
  • 3G. Chick, “Leisure and the Developmenz of Culture,”Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 11 (1984), pp. 623 -626.
  • 4G. Chick, “Anthropology and Leisure,”in S. Parker (ed.), International Handbook of Leisure Studies and Research, London: Leisure Studies Association, 1985, pp. 118 - 119.
  • 5G. Chick, “The Cross-Cultural Analysis of Leisure Behavior,”Leisure Information Quarterly ,Vol. 12(1985), pp. 8- 9.
  • 6A. L. Kroeber & C. Kluckhohn, Culture; A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions, New York; Vintage, 1963.
  • 7G. Chick, “Cultural Complexity: The Concept and Its Measurement,”Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 31 ,No. 4 (1997) ,pp. 275 - 307.
  • 8W.H. Goodenough, “Cultural Anthropology and Linguisties,”in P. L. Garvin (ed.), Report of the 7th Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Study, Washington, D. C. :Georgetown University Press, 1957,pp. 167 - 173.
  • 9J. M. Roberts, “The Self-management of Culture,”in W. H. Goodenough(ed. ), E:rplorations in Culture Anthropology, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964,pp. 433-454.
  • 10P. Richerson & R. Boyd, Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

同被引文献198

引证文献9

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部