期刊文献+

显色培养基快速检测沙门菌效果的研究 被引量:11

Studies on evaluation of chromogenic media for rapid detection of Salmonella sp.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价显色培养基对沙门菌的检测效果,探讨显色法在实际应用中的可行性。方法:本实验室研制的沙门菌(Salmonellasp.)显色培养基HKSal与经典培养基SS、DHL琼脂和国外两种同类商品化显色培养基(ZWSalI和ZWSa-lII)作对比,分别对19株质控菌、40种人工污染样品和45种实际样品进行检测。结果:3种显色培养基均具有良好的选择性及特异性;在对7株质控菌、人工污染样品和实际样品检测中,HKSal、ZWSalI和ZWSalII沙门菌显色培养基与经典培养基SS和DHL可以达到相近的检测限和灵敏度。HKSal沙门菌显色培养基对某些沙门菌的灵敏度比ZWSalII沙门菌显色培养基更高。结论:本实验室研究试制的显色培养基HKSal与国外其它的两种显色培养基一样,都具有较好的检测效果,可大大提高沙门菌的检测效率,在实际应用中具有较大的应用价值。 Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of chromogenic medium for Salmonellae detection and discuss the avilability of chromogenic method.Methods:A new Salmonella chromogenic medium HKSal prepared by our laboratory was compared with two classical media SS agar(SS) and Deoxycholate hydrogen sulfide lactose agar(DHL),and the other two chromogenic media ZWSalI and ZWSalII from abroad for detection of Salmonella by 19 reference strains in 40 samples with artificial polluting Salmonella and 45 natural samples.Results:The selectivity and the specificity of HKSal were the same as other two chromogenic media.The sensitivity of three chromogenic media was close to two classical media SS and DHL HKSal had higher specificity than ZWSalII.Conclusion:The HKSal has good efficacy and value as other two Chromogenic media which may improve the detection of efficiency in application.
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 CAS 2008年第12期2618-2620,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
基金 基金资助(2005B60302011) 基金资助(2005B80501007)
关键词 显色培养基 沙门菌 快速检测 Chromogenic media Salmonella Rapid detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献17

  • 1朱光富.快速微生物检测试剂盒和快速检测仪[J].现代商检科技,1997,7(1):59-63. 被引量:5
  • 2Enne de Boer.Update on media for isolation of Enterobacteriaceae from foods[J].Int J Food Microbiol,1998,45:43-53.
  • 3Brenner KP, Rankin CC, Roybal YR,et al.New medium for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,1993,56:3534-3544.
  • 4Berg JD, Fiksdal L.Rapid detection of total and fecal coliforms in water by enzymatic hydrolysis of 4-methylumbel- liferone-β-D-galactoside[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,1988,54:2118-2122.
  • 5Hahn G, Wittrock E.Comparison of chromogenic and fluorogenic substances for differentiation of coliforms and E.coli in soft cheese[J].Acta Microbiol Hung,1991,38:265-271.
  • 6Readycult?qcoliforms 100 presence/absence test for detection and identification of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in finished water.November 2000 Version 1.0.Merck Darmstadt Germany.
  • 7Tryland I,Fiksdal L.Enzyme characteristics of-β-D-galactosidase-and -β-D-glucuronidase-positive bacteria and their interference in rapid methods for detection of waterborne coliforms and Escherichia coli[J].Appl Environ Microbiol, 1998,64:1018-1023.
  • 8Venkateswaran K, Murakoshi A, Satake M.Comparison of commercially available kits with standard methods for the detection of coliforms and E.coli in foods[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,1996,62:2236-2243.
  • 9Edberg SC,Kontnick CM.Comparison of β-glucuronidase-based substrate systems for identification of Escherichia coli[J].J Clin Microbiol, 1986, 24:368-371.
  • 10Brenner KP, Rankin CC, Sivaganesan M, et al.Comparison of the recoveries of E . coli and total coliforms from drinking water by the MI agar method and the US Environmental Protection Agency-approved membrane filter method[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,1996,62: 203-208.

共引文献102

同被引文献135

引证文献11

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部