期刊文献+

湿润状态下托槽与弓丝间动摩擦力的实验研究 被引量:3

An experimental study on dynamic frictional resistance between brackets and archwires under the wet condition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究人工唾液条件下不同时间,几种直丝托槽与弓丝在后牙段的动摩擦力状况。方法:在人工唾液条件下,4个时间段:0、15、30、45 d,使用Instron万能材料力学实验机,模拟弓丝在后牙段滑动,按正交设计测试4种直丝托槽与4种弓丝组合在后牙段的动摩擦力。结果:3M MBT托槽的动摩擦力最小,0.48mm×0.64 mm方丝的动摩擦力最大,0.46 mm圆丝的动摩擦力最小。弓丝、托槽组合在人工唾液条件下作用15 d动摩擦力最大、30 d动摩擦力最小。结论:0.46 mm圆丝的动摩擦力最小;人工唾液作用30 d动摩擦力最小;3M MBT托槽比较适合于滑动法关闭间隙。 Objective:To study the dynamic frictional resistance in the buccal segment between preadjnsted brackets coupled with different archwires, at different times under artificial saliva condition. Methods: The dynamic friction of different combinations of 4 kinds of preadjusted brackets and 4 arehwires were tested simulating archwires sliding in the buccal segments at 4 different times(0, 15, 30, 45 d)under artificial saliva condition by using Instron universal testing machine. Results: The dynamic frictional resistance of combinations of3M MBT bracket and all archwires were the smallest. The combinations of 0.46 mm inch stainless steel round wire and all brackets produced significantly lower dynamic frictional resistance than that of other archwires. The 0.48 mm × 0.64 mm inch stainless steel rectangular wire produced the highest dynamic frictional resistance combined with all preadjusted brackets. The dynamic frictional resistance of combinations of archwires and brackets were highest at the 15th day and smallest at the 30th day under artificial saliva condition. Conclusion: 0.46 mm stainless steel round wire pro- duces the smallest dynamic frictional resistance combined with all preadjusted brackets. 3M MBT brackets are more favorable to sliding mechanics compared with other brackets. As for time, the lowest dynamic fi'ictional resistance exhibits at the 30th day under artificial saliva condition.
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期120-123,共4页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词 人工唾液 动摩擦力 托槽 弓丝 Artificial saliva Dynamic frictional resistance Bracket Archwire
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Kojirna Y, Fukui H. Numerical simulation of canine retraction by sliding mechanics [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005,127(5) :542 -551.
  • 2Burstone CJ. Variable-modulus orthodontics[J]. Am J Orthod, 1981,80( 1 ) : 1 - 16.
  • 3Sims ATP, Waters NE, Birnie DJ. A comparision of the forces rquired to produce tooth movement ex vivo through three types of pre-adjusted brackets when subjected to determined tip or torque values[J]. Br J Orthod, 1994, 21(4): 367 - 373.
  • 4Edwards GD, Davies EH, Jones SP. The ex vivo effect of ligation technique on the static frictional resistance of stainless steel brackets and archwires[ J]. Br J Orthod, 1995,22 (2) :145 - 153.
  • 5Rupali K, Pramod KS, Ram SN, et al. Comparison of frictional resistance in titanium and stainless steel brackets[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999, 116 (3): 271 - 275.
  • 6Stoner MM. Force control in clinical practice: 1. An analysis of forces currently used in orthodontic pratice and a description of new methods of contouring loops to obtain effective control in all three planes of space [ J ]. Am J Orthod, 1960, 46(3) :163 - 186.
  • 7Janet LV, Manville GD, Ram SN, et al. Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995, 107(1) :20 -27.
  • 8Glenys AT, Robert PK. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001,120 (4) : 361 - 370.
  • 9Kapila S, Angolkar PV, Duneanson MG, et al. Evaluation of friction between edgwise steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1990, 98(2) :117 - 126.
  • 10Kerosuo H,Moe G, Kelven E. In vitro release of nickel and chromium from different types of simulated orthodontic appliances[J]. AngleOrthod, 1995,65(2):111-116.

二级参考文献5

  • 1国家技术监督局.GB/T 16545-1996.金属和合金的腐蚀.腐蚀试样上腐蚀产物的清除[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1997..
  • 2Kedici SP, Aksut AA, Kilicarslan MA, et al. Corrosion behavior of dental metals and alloys in different media. J Oral Rehabil, 1998, 25(10):800.
  • 3The International Organization For Standardization( ISO ). 10271. 2001. Dental metallic materials-Corrosion test methods. Switzerland. 2002-11.
  • 4陈文,王光华,黎完模.pH对银汞合金腐蚀性能的影响[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1997,32(5):297-299. 被引量:3
  • 5解保生,朱惠兰,李爱霞,徐芸.口腔正畸用磁块镀氮化钛膜后抗人工唾液腐蚀研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2003,19(3):257-259. 被引量:18

共引文献8

同被引文献80

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部