期刊文献+

脊柱内固定器治疗爆裂骨折稳定性比较 被引量:1

COMPARISON OF SPINAL INTERNAL FIXATION SYSTEMS IN TREATING BURST FRACTURE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价后路短节段内固定器Stefee钢板、前路Kaneda器械、后路节段性钢丝固定哈氏撑开棒3种手术在植骨状态下,治疗脊柱爆裂骨折提供的生物力学稳定能力。方法利用传感器及电测技术,对13例新鲜人体胸腰段脊柱标本,计算平均顺应系数。结果除节段性钢丝固定的哈氏撑开棒手术在旋转状态失稳外,3种手术在轴压、前屈、后伸、侧弯、旋转5种运动方式皆能提供满意的稳定性。结论Kaneda器械是治疗胸腰段爆裂骨折较为理想的脊柱内固定器械。 PURPOSE To Study the three-dimensional stability of the spine injuries (i.e.burst fracture) treated respectively by three kinds of internal fixations. METHODS Thirteen intact fresh cadaveric thoracolumbar specimens were measured by 3-degree of freedom electrogniometer force and displacement transducers. The mean flexibility was computed. The operative techniques included: ①The Steffee transpedicular screws and plates (Steffee); ② The Kaneda anterior device with transverse fixators (ST); ③Harrington distraction rod fixation supplemented with segmental sublaminar wires (s. Harrington), which all used with sturt bone graft. RESULTS These operative techniques could provide good stability in compressive loading, flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation (excepts Harrington in rotation). CONCLUSIONS KT is a good spine implant in treating spinal burst fracture.
出处 《上海医科大学学报》 CSCD 1998年第3期171-173,共3页 Journal of Fudan University(Medical Science)
关键词 爆裂骨折 内固定器 稳定性 脊柱骨折 biomechnical testing burst fracture spine implants spinal stability
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献5

  • 1原林,郝松林,钟世镇.弹性活动式人工椎体构形及其力学性能[J].医用生物力学,1995,10(4):245-248. 被引量:9
  • 2原林,中国临床解剖学杂志,1994年,12卷,2期,152页
  • 3叶启彬,脊柱外科新手术,1993年,308页
  • 4赵定麟,中华外科杂志,1984年,22卷,7期,410页
  • 5团体著者,中华外科杂志,1981年,19卷,2期,107页

共引文献6

同被引文献1

  • 1饶书诚 主编.脊柱外科手术学:第2版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.651-653.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部