期刊文献+

液化后地面下沉量的估计 被引量:1

Estimation of Settlements in Sand Deposits after Liquefaction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 饱和砂样的室内循环试验表明,对于给定的相对密度,液化后重固结的体积应变随剪应变幅值的增加而增加,并且最后趋于最大体积应变。大量的液化砂层数据分析表明,绝大多数场地饱和砂层下沉的支配因素是最大体积应变。本文提出利用由试验所确定的最大体积应变和标准贯入锤击数间的关系来估计液化后地面下沉量的方法。用所建议的方法估计了13个液化场址的下沉量,所得到的估计值与野外观察的下沉量或地震灾害有较好的吻合。根据该途径所给出的地面下沉量可作为衡量场地可能出现液化的轻重程度,从而决策是否采取抗液化措施。 The cyclic loading test data shows that the post-liquefaction volumetric strain for given the relative density increase with the increasing maximum shear strain in a soil, and finally go to its maximum volumetric strain. By examining a bulk of data from liquefaction sites, the factor controlling the post-liquefaction settlements in sand deposits is the maximum volumetric strain. The methods for estimating the settlements by the relationships between SPT N and maximum volumetric strain after liquefaction are presented in the paper. The proposed methodology is used to estimate the settlements at 13 liquefaction sites. The estimated values of the settlements obtained from these examples can compare favorably with settlements or damage observed at these sites. The estimated settlements given by the procedure may be used as an index to measure liquefaction degree at the site, and then the decision carl be made whether or not to adopt anti-liquefaction measure.
出处 《工程抗震与加固改造》 北大核心 2009年第1期108-113,共6页 Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting
关键词 沉降 体积应变 液化 settlement volumetric strain liquefaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Lee K L, Albasisa A. Earthquake-induced settlements in saturated sands[J]. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 1974,100(4) :387 -400
  • 2Silver M L, Seed H B. Volume changes in sands during cyclic loading[J]. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 1971, 97(9) :1171 - 1182
  • 3Tatsuoka F, Sasaki T, Yamada S. Settlement in saturated sand induced by cyclic undrained simple shear[ A]. Proc. , 8^th World Conf. Earthq. Engrg., San Francisco, Calif., 1984:95 - 102
  • 4Tokimatsu K, Seed H B. Evaluation of settlements in sands due to earthquake shaking [ J ]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1987,113 (8)
  • 5Ishihara K, Yoshimine M. Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes [ J ]. Soils and Foundations, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1992,32( 1 )
  • 6崔卫国,符圣聪.饱和砂土层的震陷估计[J].工程勘察,1993,21(4):8-13. 被引量:1
  • 7符圣聪,江静贝.简化的液化判别概率法[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2008,30(3):93-98. 被引量:9

二级参考文献7

  • 1符圣聪,江静贝,从卫民.液化势的概率估计和判别标准[J].建筑科学,2004,20(5):49-55. 被引量:5
  • 2GB50011-2001.建筑抗震设计规范[S].[S].,..
  • 3Liao S C and Veneziano D and Whitman R V., Regression Models for Evaluating Liquefaction Probability [ J ]. J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 1988,114(4) :389 - 411
  • 4Juang C H, Chen J, Tao Jand Andrus R D., Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests[J]. J. Can. Geotech,2000,37(6):1195- 1208
  • 5Cetin K O, Seed R B, et al. Standard Penetration Test- Based Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potntial[J]. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., ASCE ,2004,130(12) : 1314 - 1340
  • 6Youd T L, ect. Liquefaction Resistance of Soil: Summary Report From The 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils [J]. J. Geotech. Engrg. ,ASCE,2001,126(10)
  • 7Seed H B, Tokimatsu H, et al. Influence of SPT procedure in seismic liquefaction resistance evaluations [ J ]. J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE,1985, 111(12):1425-1445

共引文献8

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部