期刊文献+

WTO制度、贸易不对称与国外对华反倾销——部分国家和地区对华反倾销调查的实证分析 被引量:15

WTO System,Asymmetric Trade Relation and Foreign Countries' Antidumping Against China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文利用计数模型,从WTO制度和贸易不对称角度分析了1994~2006年间美国、欧盟、澳大利亚、土耳其、墨西哥、阿根廷和印度对华反倾销调查的共同影响因素,结果发现,WTO制度和中外贸易不对称关系严重影响着国外对中国的反倾销政策。中国加入WTO显著地增加了国外对中国反倾销调查的数量;中国双边贸易不对称度上升和中外双边贸易量的增加,引起国外对中国反倾销数量增加;中国对外反倾销调查数量增加会显著抑制国外对华反倾销调查行动。 This paper estimates the determinants of foreign antidumping inves- tigations against China by the United States, the European Union, Australia, Turkey, Mexico, Argentina and India during the 1994-2006 period using a count regression model, and then finds that the WTO rules and the asymmetric trade relation between China and foreign countries increase the amount of antidumping inves- tigations against China. Specifically, China's accession to WTO, asymmetry of China - foreign trade and foreign trade growth significantly increase antidumping in- vestigations against China, and China's anti- dumping investigations against foreign countries significantly decreases foreign anti - dumping investigations against China.
作者 杨艳红
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期102-111,共10页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基金 国家社科基金"环境友好 资源节约型外贸发展模式研究"(08CJL026)资助
关键词 反倾销 贸易不对称 WTO制度 Antidumping Asymmetric Trade Relation WTO System
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Feinberg, R. M, 2005, U. S. Antidumping Enforcement and Macroeconomic Indicators Revisited: Do Petitioners Learn? [J],Review of World Economics, Vol. 141, No. 4, 612-622.
  • 2Knetter, Michael M. and Thomas J. Prusa, 2003, Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries [J], Journal of International Economics, October 1-17.
  • 3Mah, J. S. , 2000, Antidumping Decisions and Macroeconomic Variables in the USA [J], Applied Economics, Vol. 32, 1701-1709.
  • 4Prusa, Thomas , Susan Skeath, 2002, Modern Commercial Policy: Managed Trade or Retaliation? [R], Wellesley College Working Paper 2002-2005. http: //ssrn. com/abstract=331520.
  • 5Feinberg, Robert M. and Kara M. Reynolds, 2006, The Spread of Antidumping Regimes and the Role of Retaliation in Filings [J], Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 72 (4), 877-890.
  • 6Blonigen, Bruce, Bown, Chad, 2003, Antidumpingand Retaliation Threats [J], Journal of International Economics, Vol. 60, 249-273.
  • 7Robert. M. Feinberg and Kara M. Reynolds, 2005, Tariff Liberalization and Increased Administrative Protection: Is There a Quid Pro Que? [R], Http: //econpapers. repec. org/paper/wpawuwpit/ 0501001. htm.
  • 8Chad P, Bown, 2006, The WTO and Antidumping in Developing Countries [R], http: // www. heisummer.ch/pdf/Contingency%20Protection/bown%20antidumping%20developing. pdf.
  • 9Prusa, T.J. , 2006, EastAsia's Antidumping Problem [J], The World Economy, Vol. 29, No. 4, 743-761.
  • 10Bown, C. P. , McCulloch, R. , 2006, U.S. Trade Policy Toward China : Discrimination and Its Implications [R], http: //people. brandeis. edu/-rmccullo/wp/PAFTAD0605. pdf.

二级参考文献47

共引文献146

同被引文献136

引证文献15

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部