摘要
近年来,人类学开始关注灾难,为灾区和灾民增加了一份社会与人文关怀。布莱基等把灾难的社会与自然原因分别置于"原因序列"(spectrum of causation)的两端:有些灾难由社会原因造成,有些灾难由自然原因造成,有些则由社会和自然原因共同造成。目前的灾难人类学有四种研究取向:考古和历史的取向、政治-生态的取向、应用取向、社会-文化及行为的取向。灾难研究还可取"体化"、皮尔斯的"对象"三分理论、社会记忆、"大传统"和"小传统"及"空无"的研究视角。
Recent years have seen anthropology starting to focus on disasters, bringing more social care and humanity to post-disaster areas and people. Blaikie and others place social and natural causes of disasters on the two ends of the spectrum of causation. Some disasters are caused by social factors, some by natural factors, and still some by a mixture of both. At present, there are four research approaches to the anthropology of disaster: archaeology and history; politics-ecology; social application; social-cultural and behavioral approach. Besides, the anthropology of disaster can also consider such approaches as 'embodiment,' Peircean Thirdness, social memory, 'great tradition' and 'small tradition,' and 'communitas.'
出处
《西南民族大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第9期11-13,共3页
Journal of Southwest Minzu University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
