摘要
目的比较采用中国疾病预防控制信息系统网络直报方式与传统的邮局寄送传报卡的方式对传染病疫情上报的及时性的影响。方法分别将通过2种方式上报的传报卡建立Excel数据库,用SPSS进行统计分析,比较不同报告方式及时性的差异。结果2004年通过2种方式上报的报告卡分别为829张,网络直报方式上报传染病疫情平均用时0.39d,上报及时率为91.07%;邮局寄送方式上报传染病疫情平均用时2.23d,上报及时率54.04%,2种方式上报及时率差异有统计学意义(χ2=285.486,P<0.01)。不同级别的医疗机构上报及时率也存在差异。结论通过网络直报方式上报传染病报告卡的及时率更高,应该通过多种渠道,完善中国疾病预防控制信息系统基层网络建设,发挥网络直报方式在传染病疫情控制中的优势作用。
[Objective] To compare the effects of 2 ways of disease report, including direct network report by China Information System for Diseases Control and Prevention and mailing the report cards of infectious diseases, on timely characters. [Methods] The infectious diseases cards reported by the above 2 ways were inputted into Excel to establish a database, then using SPSS to conducted statistical analysis, and compare the difference of timely characters. [ Results] A total of 829 cards were reported through the 2 ways in 2004, the average time of direct network report was 0.39 d, with the timeliness rate of 91.07% ; the average time of mailing the report cards was 2.23 d, with the timeliness rate of 54.04%. The difference of timeliness rates between the 2 ways was significant （x^2 =285. 486, P 〈0.01 ） ,and it also existed in hospitals of different levels. [Conclusion]The direct network report has a higher timeliness rate, the grass-roots networks of China Information System for Diseases Control and Prevention should be improved through multiple channels, so as to take advantage of superiority of direct network report in infectious disease control.
出处
《职业与健康》
CAS
2009年第3期276-278,共3页
Occupation and Health
关键词
疫情报告方式
网络直报
及时性
传染病
Ways of infectious disease report
Direct network report
Timely character
Infectious disease
