期刊文献+

高管团队心理契约与组织绩效关系的实证研究——基于企业相对规模的比较 被引量:8

Empirical Study of Relationship between Psychological Contract of Top Management Team and Organizational Performance——A Comparative Research on Relative Size of Enterprises
原文传递
导出
摘要 心理契约实质上是一种关于关系双方对等权利义务的主观假设或约定。由于高管团队成员在企业成长中处于关键性的决策者位置,他们与公司间心理契约关系的动态变化将影响到企业规模扩张的质量。文章以212家不同相对规模的企业为样本,实证研究表明:高管团队交易型心理契约和关系型心理契约均与组织绩效显著正相关;相对规模类型对高管团队交易型心理契约有显著影响,但对高管团队关系型心理契约没有显著影响;相对规模类型对高管团队心理契约与组织绩效的交互作用有显著影响。 Psychological contract is the promises of reciprocity fight and compulsory between the two parties. As top management team is the main decision- maker in enterprise growth, the dynamic change of psychological contract between top management team and corporate will have an effect on the quality of enterprise' s scale dilation. Based on 212 enterprises of different relative size, this empirical study shows that transactional and relational psychological contract of top management team have positive effect on organizational performance, relative size can affect transactional but not relational psychological contract of top management team, and relative size can affect the relation between psychological contract of top management team and organizational performance.
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期69-75,共7页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70672107) 全国博士后科研基金资助项目(20070410331) 江苏省博士后科研资助计划项目(0701043C)
关键词 高管团队 心理契约 相对规模 团队绩效 公司绩效 top management team psychological contract relative size team performance corporate performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Hambrick, D. C., Mason, P. A.. Upper echelon: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2) : 193 - 206.
  • 2Levinson, H., Price, C. R., Munden, K. J., Mandl, H., Solley, C. M.. Men, Management and mental health [ M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.
  • 3陈忠卫,贾培蕊.基于心理契约的高层管理团队凝聚力问题研究[J].管理科学,2004,17(5):46-52.
  • 4Robinson S. L., Rousseau D. M.. Violating the Psychological Contract: Not the Exception but the Norm [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1994, 15(3):245-259.
  • 5Freese, C., Schalk, R.. Implications of Differences in Psychological Contracts for Human Resource Management [ J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1996, 5(4) :501 - 510.
  • 6Tumley , W. H. and Feldman W. C.. The Impact of Psychological Contract Violations on Exit, Voice, loyalty, and Neglect [J]. Human Relations, 1999, 52, (7) :895 - 922.
  • 7黄文艳,马剑虹.组织中的心理契约[J].人类工效学,2006,12(1):69-71. 被引量:6
  • 8Herriot, P.,Manning, E. G. , Kidd, J. M.. The Content of the Psychological Contract [J]. British Journal of Management, 1997, 8:151 - 162.
  • 9Tsui, A., Pearce, J., Porter, L., Tripoli, A.. Alternative Approaches to the Employee Organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay Off [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40:1089-1121.
  • 10Millward, L. J., Hopkins, L. J.. Psychological Contracts, Organizational and Job Commitment [ J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1998, 28(16):1530- 1556.

二级参考文献84

共引文献136

同被引文献154

引证文献8

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部