期刊文献+

汶川“5.12”地震中的“心理台风眼”效应 被引量:36

Psychological Typhoon Eye in 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake of May 12
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在"5.12"地震后1个月左右时间里,对非灾区(北京、福建和湖南共542人)、灾区(四川和甘肃共1720人)居民进行了有计划的大规模调查,探索并检验"5.12"汶川大地震是否产生了"心理台风眼"效应。结果发现,非灾区、轻度灾区、中度灾区和重度灾区居民对灾区居民恢复到灾前生活水平所需时间和每户受灾家庭所需资金的估计存在显著差异;非灾区居民比灾区居民认为恢复到灾前生活水平所需时间更长。有悖于一般常识以及所谓公共风险事件的涟漪效应,汶川大地震产生了"心理台风眼"效应,非灾区居民对灾情严重程度的担忧反而高于灾区居民。加深对"心理台风眼"效应的理解,对突发公共事件下各级部门的政策制定和公共管理具有积极的借鉴意义。 To analyze whether there is a so-called "Psychological Typhoon Eye" effect in 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake of May 12, a survey was carried out one month or so after the Earthquake. Residents in non-devastated area (N=542), slightly devastated area, moderately devastated area and extremely devastated area (N=1720) were asked to estimate the time and money needed for the reconstruction and rehabilitation of devastated areas. The ANOVA analysis shows that the main effect of devastation degree on estimated time and money is significant. The estimated time and money for the reconstruction and rehabilitation of devastated areas are greater by those in non-devastated area than by those in devastated area. A "Psychological Typhoon Eye" effect is in evidence, as contrary to common sense and ripple effect, where residents in non-devastated area tend to worry more than their counterparts in devastated area.
出处 《科技导报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期87-89,共3页 Science & Technology Review
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向性项目(KKCX1-YW-05) 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KSCX2-YW-R-130) 中国科学院心理研究所青年基金项目(O8CX025002) 国家自然科学基金项目(70671099)
关键词 汶川地震 心理台风眼 涟漪效应 Wenchuan Earthquake psychological typhoon eye ripple effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Guedeney C, Mendel G. L'angoisse atomique et les centrales nucleaires: Contribution psychanalytique et sociopsychanalytique 6 l'6tude d'un phenomene collectif[M]. Paris: Payot, 1973.
  • 2Lindell M K, Earle T C. How close is close enough: Public perceptions of the risks of industrial facilities[J]. Risk Analysis, 1983, 3(4): 245-253.
  • 3Maderthaner R, Guttman G, Swaton E, et al. Effect of distance upon risk perception[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63(3): 380-382.
  • 4Okeke C U, Armour A. Post-landfill sitting perceptions of nearby residents: A ease study of Halton landfill [J]. Applied Geography, 1999, 20(2): 137-154.
  • 5梁哲,许洁虹,李纾,孙彦,刘长江,叶先宝.突发公共安全事件的风险沟通难题--从心理学角度的观察[J].自然灾害学报,2008,17(2):25-30. 被引量:48
  • 6李金珍,李纾,许洁虹.灾难事件后继风险决策[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(4):37-43. 被引量:6
  • 7Slovic P. Perception of risk[J]. Science, 1978, 236(17): 280-285.
  • 8谢晓非,郑蕊,谢冬梅,王惠.SARS中的心理恐慌现象分析[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(4):628-639. 被引量:77
  • 9谢晓非,郑蕊.风险沟通与公众理性[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(4):375-381. 被引量:182
  • 10Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance [M]. Evanston: Row, Peterson, 1957.

二级参考文献59

共引文献306

同被引文献455

引证文献36

二级引证文献302

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部