摘要
"新历史小说"与"新历史主义"的关系问题在当代理论界和批评界一直存在分歧。中国本土的社会生活和文化与文学的双向影响以及文学自身的经验积淀和革新要求为"新历史小说"的形成和发展提供了充足的营养,是其生长之根,它有中国本土小说发展流变的特色。而新历史主义是一种"文化诗学",从它自身的理论建树以及在中国被引进、介绍的情况看,"新历史小说"与"新历史主义"之间不存在直接的联系。
Contemporary theorists and critics have diverse views on the relationship between new-historical novel and neo-historicism. It is the bidirectional influence of Chinese native social life, Chinese culture and Chinese literature as well as experience accumulation of literature along with innovation that provide sufficient nutrition for the formation and development of ＂the new historical novel＂. It is the root of its growth with its own characteristics of the devolvement of Chinese native novel. However, neo--historicism is ＂culture poetics＂. According to its own theoretical achievement and the situation in which it was introduced to China, there is no direct relationship between the two.
出处
《湛江师范学院学报》
2009年第1期80-83,共4页
Journal of Zhanjiang Normal College
关键词
新历史小说
新历史主义
本土文化
本土文学
文化诗学
new-historical novel
neo-historicism
native culture
native literature
culture poetics
