摘要
本文通过对比建构教学同现有传统的图面设计教学在调研、设计、成果表达三个阶段的异同,着重比较了两种教学形式对建筑设计的不同认知和表现方式,指出传统图面设计的不足与建构教学对建筑学专业学生理解建筑空间、体会材料性能的重要性,提出建构设计与图面设计的有机结合是改善当前建筑学教学质量的关键。
Comparing design education on tectonics with traditional design education on drawing from three design stages： investigating, designing and production making, this paper aims to contrast their different cognitive and expressive methods on treating architectural design and point out the shortage of the latter, as well as explain the importance of the former for architecture majors to understand the architectural space and realize the performance of materials. In the end, it put forwards that the combination of the two is the key to improve the current teaching quality of architecture.
出处
《室内设计》
2009年第1期51-53,共3页
Interior Design
基金
重庆大学国家大学生创新性实验计划资助项目成果阶段论文
项目编号CQUCX-G-2007-48
关键词
建构设计
图面设计
三维感知
技术
材料
Design on Tectonics
Design on Drawing
Three-dimensional Perception
Technology
Material
