摘要
和解制度在反垄断法实施中运用十分广泛,这主要是因为和解制度特别契合反垄断法的自身特点,存在明显的积极功能。反垄断执法机构与相对人之间缔结和解契约应符合"有关事实状况或者法律观点不确定且难以查明"这一基本前提,同时和解必须有利于公共利益。实践中,协商和解过程依循非正式程序进行,为防止执法机构滥用公权力,必须重视对和解契约的监督。
Because the reconciliation system corresponds with the anti-monopoly law＇ s basic character, it is extensively applicable to the implementation of anti-monopoly law. When contracting with the suspected person, the anti-monopoly organization must abide by two important prerequisites. Firstly, it is difficult to make a thorough investigation of the true facts or to ascertain the applicable law idea. Secondly, the reconciliation contract should be helpful ＂to the public interests. In practice, in order to avoid the anti-monopoly organization to abuse it＇ s power, anti-monopoly law must design a series of system to supervise the reconciliation action.
出处
《当代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第2期23-29,共7页
Contemporary Law Review
关键词
反垄断执法机构
和解制度
非正式程序
implementation of anti-monopoly law
reconciliation system
informal implementation procedure
