摘要
运用多种研究方法,从"一个历史的论断"、"一个封闭的论断"等几个方面对"技击是武术本质特征"这一大家坚持了多年的命题进行了理论的质疑。研究认为,技击作为武术的一个原点功能,随着武术的文化得以形成、嬗变与发展,它必将经历着一个同步的质变过程,中国的文化使得"技击"与"文化"、"生活"一起不断地演绎推向更深刻的、更模糊的方向上去。正是基于浓厚的东方文化,武术及其拳技不再仅仅作为一种求生存、好勇斗狠的暴力手段而存在,"技击之打"只能是中国武术这棵苍劲的千年古树的一个枝蔓。最后认为:中国武术是一个由简单不断走向复杂的过程,一个从"技击"走向"文化"的过程。
Ihis paper has carried on a theory question, using multiple kinds of research methods, from ＂a historical judgment＂, ＂a conservative judgment＂ and other aspects questioning ＂art of attack is the essential character of Wushu＂, an issue held for many years. The research believes that, as a original function, art of attack forms, evolves and develops along with Wushu culture, and will certainly to experience a synchronized qualitative change process. Chinese culture combines ＂art of attack＂ with ＂culture＂ and ＂life＂, deducting to a more profound, vague direction continuously. Based on the intensive eastem culture, Wushu and its the fist technique no longer merely perform as a kind strives for survival and violent fight, and ＂hitting of the art of attack＂ only can be a branch of Chinese Wushu. It finally believes that the Chinese Wushu is a process developing from simple to complex, from ＂art of attack＂ to ＂culture＂.
出处
《北京体育大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第1期28-34,共7页
Journal of Beijing Sport University
关键词
武术
技击
本质
质疑
Wushu
art of attack
essence
questioning
