摘要
习俗作为一种生活常识、常理、常规、常情,不但能影响法官的思维方式,在某些具体情景中还可以成为法官断案的合理性判准,甚至在某些特殊机制中对法官的法律推理有所助益。大小前提的确认是一种建构性活动,因而习俗在建构大小前提中是可以发挥其作用的:即习俗在疑难案件中通过法律解释、价值衡量、漏洞补充、法律论证等方法发挥其对建构大前提作用;而在小前提中则通过推论方式发挥其确认法律事实的作用。
Customs will not a reasonable basis for his ju only affect the judge＇s way of thinking but also in some specific circumstances serve as dgment or ruling. In some even special cases, customs could help with the judge＇s legal reasoning. Identification of the major premise and the minor premise is a constructive activity, wherein customs could play a role. Specifically, customs could help with the building of the major premises through the interpretation of the law, value evaluation, remedying loopholes, legal argument and others. They could play a role in the construction of the minor premises by helping with the confirmation of the legal fact through deduction and reasoning.
出处
《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第2期23-30,共8页
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金项目“法律推理研究--语用学与语用逻辑的视角”(07BZX046)的阶段性成果之一
关键词
习俗
大小前提建构
作用
customs
construction of premises
function
