摘要
【目的】编制完全本土文化背景的儿童早期家庭养育环境评价量表。【方法】查阅有关文献和专家访谈,构建儿童养育环境条目库,经试验性测试形成“初始问卷”。分层随机抽取232名3~6岁儿童家长初步测试,探索性因素分析形成“3~6岁儿童家庭养育环境试用问卷”。再次分层随机抽取10个市县城区3~6岁儿童,完成696份“试用问卷”测评,部分儿童完成“CBCL量表”测试。删除CR值达不到显著水平、与总分相关系数<0.30的条目以及项目负荷量<0..4的条目,形成正式量表后进行信度检验和效度检验。【结果】量表由53个条目组成,同质信度克伦巴赫a系数为0.930,分半信度为0.871,重测信度系数0.707;量表总分与儿童CBCL总分之间呈明显负相关(r=-0.455),内容效度和结构效度均达到良好水平。【结论】量表信度、效度良好,各项指标均达到了测量学的要求,可以作为3~6岁儿童家庭养育环境的评价工具。
[Objective] To develop a early Child Home Nurture Environment Scales based on Chinese culture background. [Methods] The items pools were established after reviewing a lot of correlative literatures and some opened inquiry questionnaire were fulfilled by a few experts. "3~6 Years Child Nurture Environment Probative Questionnaire" was made by exploratory factor analysis with data of 232 parents of 3~6 years old children. Another exploratory factor analysis was carried out through 696 parents of 3~6 years children from 10 cities. Parts of 4~6 years children performed the test of CBCL. The insensitive items were deleted by critical ratio and Pearson correlation analysis. Exploratory factor analysis was used for developing and evaluating the structure of the scales. Reliability analysis and validity were evaluated. [Results] 3~6 Years Child Home Nurture Environment Questionnaire consisted of 53 items. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0. 930. Guttman split-half reliability was 0. 871 ,test-retest reliability was 0. 707. Correlation coefficient between total score and child CBCL was -0. 455. Content validity, construct validity and criterion-related validity were satisfied. [Conclusions] Reliability and validity of 3~6 Years Child Home Nurture Environment Questionnaire are all satisfied and entirely accord with psychometric demands. The scales can be used as a practicable instrument for people to evaluate child home environment.
出处
《中国儿童保健杂志》
CAS
2009年第2期134-136,139,共4页
Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
基金
山东省医药卫生科技发展项目[(2005)105]
关键词
儿童家庭养育环境
量表
编制
信度
效度
child home nurture environment
questionnaire
development
reliability' validity