摘要
在对马克思早期思想逻辑进程的研究中,国内最近一段时间对《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中"两条逻辑"展开了"南北之争"。在双方的背后,"接着说"便成为一种积极的学术态度。在不局限"论争"的问题域基础上直接追问":类本质的异化"的思维方式在马克思那里是否得以承接?在《手稿》时期,马克思有没有一个"费尔巴哈思想遗迹"的问题?如果说不存在一个"费尔巴哈时期"又会在马克思哲学研究中引起哪些问题?从而认为,马克思继承了费尔巴哈哲学后缀的"唯物主义",在一般唯物主义基础上通达辩证唯物主义,最终拉开了历史唯物主义的序幕。
Two viewpoints in Marx＇s Economic ＆ Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 are still debating the process of studying Marx＇s early thought. Asking the following questions is probably a positive academic attitude： did Marx follow the thinking way of alienated species essence？ Was there a problem of Feuerbach＇s thought heritage during the ＂manuscript＂ period？ What problems would be caused if there wasn＇t a Feuerbach period？ This paper holds that Marx inherited Feuerhach＇s materialism, then created dialectical materialism and historical materialism.
出处
《北京行政学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第2期47-51,共5页
Journal of Beijing administration institute
