期刊文献+

^18 F-FDG PET—CT在非小细胞肺癌术前区域淋巴结分期中的价值 被引量:5

Value of ^18 F-FDG PET-CT in the preoperative N staging of non-small cell lung cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨^18 F—FDGPET—CT在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者术前区域淋巴结(N)分期方面的价值,以及CT密度和双时相扫描在淋巴结性质判定方面的作用。方法43例手术病理证实的NSCLC患者均于术前行 ^18 F—FDGPET—CT扫描,对常规扫描图像采用PET法(单纯根据^18 F—FDG摄取水平判断淋巴结性质)和PET+CT密度法(结合CT密度和摄取水平判断淋巴结性质)分析。摄取水平通过目测法和半定量分析法结合判定。双时相扫描的储留指数(RI)〉10%为摄取升高。以病理检查作为金标准对所得结果进行分析。结果以区域淋巴结组为单位,PET法的诊断敏感度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为88.0%、88.4%、88.3%、59.5%和97.4%,PET+CT密度法的相应值分别为84.0%,94.6%、92.9%、75.O%和96.8%,其中2种方法的特异度和准确度之间差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。28组淋巴结行双时相扫描,良恶性组摄取变化值(△SUVmax)之间和RI之间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);在23组延迟相摄取升高的淋巴结中,11组为转移;在5组无摄取升高的淋巴结中,1组为转移。结论^18 F—FDGPET-CT在肺癌患者术前N分期方面有较高的诊断价值,结合淋巴结CT密度和^18 F—FDG摄取水平可进一步提高诊断的特异度和准确度。对于常规相摄取增高的淋巴结,延迟相摄取升高对判断淋巴结性质的价值有限,但无摄取升高则更支持良性诊断。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of PET-CT with ^18 F-FDG in preoperative N staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) , especially the additional value of CT attenuation and the dual-time-point imaging in determining the lymph nodes status. Methods Forty-three NSCLC patients underwent curative surgical resection after integrated ^18 F-FDG PET-CT examination. The initial scan images were analyzed by two methods. In the first method, the nodal status was determined by ^18 F-FDG uptake only (method PET). In the second method, the nodal status was determined by uptake associated with CT attenuation (method PET and CT attenuation ). Nodal uptake was interpreted visually and semi quantitatively. For dual-time-point imaging, a retention index (RI) 〉 10% was regarded as increasing trend. Histopathologic results served as the reference standard. Results On the per-nodal-station (group) basis, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV were 88.0%, 88.4%, 88.3% , 59.5% and 97.4%, respectively, by the method 1 ; 84.0%, 94.6%, 92.9%, 75.0% and 96.8%, respectively, by the method 2. The specificity and accuracy between these two methods had statistically significant difference (P 〈 0.05 ). Twenty-eight nodal groups underwent dual-time-point imaging and the differences of ASUVmax and RI between benign and malignant groups had no statistically significant difference ( P 〉 0.05 ). Eleven groups were malignant in 23 lymph nodal groups which had an increasing trend. Among the 5 nodal groups which did not show increase in delayed scan, one group was malignant. Conclusion ^18 F-FDG PET-CT has high diagnostic value in the preoperative N staging of NSCLC, and combining uptake with CT attenuation of lymph nodes can improve the specificity and accuracy. For the lymph nodes with high uptake in the initial scan, increasing uptake in delayed scan has little effect in differentiatial diagnosis, but no increasing in delayed phase is more prone to benign diagnosis.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期288-292,共5页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
基金 “十一五”国家科技支撑计划课题(2007BA105805) 2007年度教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20070023041)
关键词 肺肿瘤 肿瘤分期 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 线计算机 脱氧葡萄糖 Lung neoplasms Neoplasm staging Tomography, emission-computed Tomography, X-ray computed Deoxyglucose
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Antoch G, Stattans J, Nemat AT, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative staging. Radiology, 2003,229:526-533.
  • 2De Wever W, Ceyssens S, Mortelmans L, et al. Additional value of PET-CT in the staging of lung cancer: comparison with CT alone, PET alone and visual correlation of PET and CT. Eur Radiol, 2007, 17:23-32.
  • 3Shim SS, Lee KS, Kim BT, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: prospective comparison of integrated FDG PET/CT and CT alone for preoperative staging. Radiology, 2005, 236 : 1011-1019.
  • 4Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF, et al. Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med, 2003, 348:2500-2507.
  • 5胡漫,李明焕,孔莉,刘宁波,杨国仁,于金明.^18F-FDGPET-CT在原发灶不明转移性肿瘤诊断中的应用[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2008,30(9):699-701. 被引量:6
  • 6Al-San-af N, Aziz R, Doddakula K, et al. Factors causing inaccurate staging of mediastinal nodal involvement in non-small cell lung cancer patients staged by positron emission tomography. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, 2007, 6:350-353.
  • 7Chung JH, Cho KJ, Lee SS, et al. Overexpression of Glut1 in lymphoid follicles correlates with false-positive ISF-FDG PET results in lung cancer staging. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45:999-1003.
  • 8Tournoy KG, Maddens S, Gosselin R, et al. Integrated FDG-PET/CT does not make invasive staging of the intrathoraeic lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer redundant: a prospective study. Thorax, 2007, 62:696-701.
  • 9Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambright ES, et al. Dual time point ^18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. J Nucl Med. 2001. 42,1412-1417.
  • 10胡漫,于金明,刘宁波,刘兰平,郭洪波,杨国仁,张品良,徐晓庆.^18F-FDG PET—CT双时相显像对非小细胞肺癌肺门纵隔淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2008,30(4):306-309. 被引量:5

二级参考文献10

  • 1巩合义,于金明,付政,李宝生,李建彬,刘同海.PET/CT对非小细胞肺癌临床分期及精确放疗计划的影响[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(1):54-57. 被引量:35
  • 2袁双虎,于金明,于甬华,付政,郭洪波,刘同海,杨新华,杨国仁,李文武.FDG PET/CT与PET对食管癌淋巴结转移的诊断价值比较[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2007,29(3):221-224. 被引量:14
  • 3Yuan S, Yu Y, Chao KS, et al, Additional value of PET-CT over PET in assessment of locoregional lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer. J Nucl Med, 2006, 47 : 1255- 1259.
  • 4Matthies A, Hickeson M, Cuchiara A, et al. Dual time point ^18F- FDG PET for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med, 2002, 43:871-875.
  • 5Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambfight ES, et al. Dual time point ^18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. J Nucl Med, 2001,42 : 1412-1417.
  • 6Rohren EM, Lowe VJ. Update in PET imaging of non small cell lung cancer. Semin Nucl Med, 2004, 34:134-153.
  • 7Houseni M, Hamroonrat W, Bural G, et al, Pattern of the tumor metabolism differs between the primary cancer of the lung and the metastatic lymph nodes as determined by FDG-PET dual-timepoint imaging, J Nuel Med, 2006, 47(Suppl) :427p.
  • 8Boemer AR, Weckesser M, Herzog H, et al, Optimal scan time for fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in breast cancer, Eur J Nucl Med, 1999, 26:226-230.
  • 9Xiu Y, Bhutani C, Dhurairaj T, et al. Dual-time point FDG PET imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules with minimally increased metabolic activity. Clin Nucl Med, 2007, 32:101-105.
  • 10于金明.二十一世纪的放射肿瘤学[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2002,24(6):521-525. 被引量:80

共引文献9

同被引文献45

  • 1Stroobants S,Verschakelen J.Value of FDG-PET in the management of non-small lung cancer.Eu- rJ radiol,21)03,45.
  • 2National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology non-small cell lung cancer V,2.2008 EB/ 0L.(2008-02-10),.
  • 3West H, Harpole 1), Travs W. Histologic considerations t-r individualized systemic ther-Apy approaches for the n,anagement of nonsmall cell cancer. Chest,2009,136(4): 1112-1118.
  • 4刘兰平,于金明,郭洪波,李万龙,张秀丽,付政,孔莉.^(18)F-FDG PET/CT显像在非小细胞肺癌淋巴结转移及分期中的应用[J].中华核医学杂志,2007,27(5):264-266. 被引量:6
  • 5陈虞梅,孙晓光,刘建军,施一平,万良荣,黄钢.^(18)F-FDG PET/CT对非小细胞肺癌术前T及N分期的价值[J].中华核医学杂志,2007,27(5):267-269. 被引量:1
  • 6Rusch VW, Asamura H, Watanabe H, et al. The IASLC lungcancer staging project: A proposal for a new international lymphnode map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classifi-cation for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol, 2009,4(5) : 568-577.
  • 7Fischer B, Lassen U, Mortensen J, et al. Preoperative staging oflung cancer with combined PET-CT. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361(1):32-39.
  • 8Farmakis S, Vejdani K, Muzaffar R, et al. Detection of meta-static disease in cardiophrenic lymph nodes : FDG PET/CT versuscontrast-enhanced CT and implications for staging and treatmentof disease. Frontiers In Oncology, 2013, 3 : 260.
  • 9Takenaka T, Yano T, Morodomi Y, et al. Prediction of true-negative lymph node metastasis in clinical IA non-small cell lungcancer by measuring standardized uptake values on positron emis-sion tomography. Surg Today, 2012, 42( 10) : 934-939.
  • 10Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. Ratio of the maximum standardized up-take value on FDG-PET of the mediastinal (N2) lymph nodes tothe primary tumor may be a universal predictor of nodal malignan-cy in patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg,2007, 83(5) :1826-1829 ; discussion 1829-1830.

引证文献5

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部