期刊文献+

多层螺旋CT后处理技术对肝癌动脉的显示价值 被引量:9

Value of multi-slice spiral CT angiography in displaying liver cancer artery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨多层螺旋CT后处理技术对于肝癌动脉的显示价值。方法:173例肝癌患者中,男131例,女42例;年龄33~82岁。采用多层螺旋CT机进行增强扫描。将动脉期图像数据以多平面重建、最大密度投影及容积再现等模式对血管进行显示分析。曲面重组和曲面最大密度投影技术也被应用。结果:在评价肝动脉解剖识别方面,容积再现技术和最大密度投影显著优于多平面重建(P<0.001),且容积再现技术优于最大密度投影(P<0.001)。在评价肿瘤病灶供血动脉方面,最大密度投影显著优于多平面重建和容积再现技术(P<0.001),且容积再现技术优于多平面重建(P<0.05)。在评价肿瘤血管的连续性和血管形态方面,MIP优于VRT(P<0.001);MIP优于MPR(P<0.001);VRT优于MPR(P<0.001)。结论:多层螺旋CT血管成像技术是一种重要的对肝癌供血动脉的评价方法。MIP为评价肝脏血管的最佳模式,有助于外科手术和介入治疗。 Objective:To discuss the value of the multi-slice spiral CT in displaying the feeding artery of liver cancer. Methods:Of 173 eases with liver tumor, 131 were male, 42 were female, aged from 33 to 82 years old. Multi-slice spiral CT enhanced scanning was performed in each ease. Arterial phase vascular images were reconstructed, using multi-planar recoustruetions (MPR), maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volume rendering tecimique (VRT). Curved planar reconstructions(CPR) and curved maximum intensity projection (cMPR) were used too. Results:With respect to identitying hepatic artery, VRT had strong three-dimentlonal effect, being superior to MIP ( P 〈 0.001) and MPR ( P 〈 0.001). MIP was superior to MPR ( P 〈 0.001). VRT was superior to MPR ( P 〈 0.001). As for displaying the tumor artery, MIP was superior to VRT ( P 〈 0.001) and MPR ( P 〈 0.001). VRT was superior to MPR ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion:Multi-slice spiral CT angiography is a very important technique for evaluating feeding arteries of liver cancer. MIP is the one of the best technique. This will provide useful information for surgical operation and interventional therapy.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2009年第4期424-427,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 肝癌 体层摄影术 X线计算机 图像重建 Liver tumor Angiography Multi-slice spiral scanning Computed tomography Imaging reconstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Saba L, Mallarini G. Multidetector row CT angiography in the evaluation of the hepatic artery and its anatomical variants[J]. Clinical Radiology, 2008, 63:312- 321.
  • 2Byun JH, Kim TK, Lee SS, et al. Evaluation of the hepatic artery in potential donors for living donor liver transplantation by computed tomography angiography using multi-detector row computer tomography: comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection techniques[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2003, 27:125 - 131.
  • 3Alonso-Torres A, Femandez-Cuadrado J, Pinilla I, et al. Multidetector CT in the evaluation of potential living donors for liver transplantation [J]. RadioGraphics, 2005, 25:1017-1030.
  • 4Sahani D, Metha A, Blake M, et al. Preoperative vascular hepatic evaluation with CT and MR angiography : implications for surgery [ J ]. Radio Graphics, 2004, 24:1367 - 1380.
  • 5Boll TD, Bulow H, Blackman KA, et al. MDCT Angiography of the spinal vasculature and the artery of Adamkiewicz [ J ]. AJR, 2006, 187 : 1054 - 1060.
  • 6Marcus CD, Ladam-Marcus VJ, Bigot JL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: evaluation at CT with the volume rendering technique[J]. Radiology, 1999,211:775 - 780.
  • 7Corti R, Alerci M, Wyttenbach R, et al. Usefulness of multiplanar reconstructions in evaluation of carotid CT angiography[J]. Radiology, 2003, 226:290- 291.
  • 8Winter TC, Freeny PC, Nghiem HV, et al. Hepatic arterial anatomy in transplantation candidates: evaluation with three dimensional CT arteriography[J]. Radiology, 1995, 195:363-370.
  • 9Smith PA, Klein AS, Heath DG, et al. Dual-phase spiral CT angiography with volumetric 3D rendering for preoperative liver transplant evaluation: preliminary observations [J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2003, 27:125 - 131.
  • 10Nghiem HV, Dimas CT, Mc Vicar JP, et al. Impact of double helical CT and three dimensional CT arteriography on surgical planning for hepatic transplantation[J]. Abdom Imaging, 1999, 24:278 - 284.

同被引文献60

引证文献9

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部