摘要
目的修订多发性硬化患者生存质量量表-54（MSQOL-54），检验该量表的信度和效度。方法1．对源量表进行翻译和回译，再进行文化调适和预测试；2．通过对30例多发性硬化患者的生存质量进行测评，检验多发性硬化患者生存质量量表中文版的信度和效度。结果多发性硬化患者生存质量量表中文版的信度检验显示量表总分和其13个方面的重测相关系数大于0．7；量表总分和12个方面的Cronbach系数都大于0．7，分半信度为0．96；因子分析结果提示该量表的结构效度好；除认知方面外，其他方面与总分显著相关（r=0．40～0．84）；该量表与SF-36的效标效度为0．98；患者与正常人该量表得分比较，除了性功能和对性功能的满意度方面外，其他方面得分有显著差异。结论多发性硬化患者生存质量量表．54中文版的信度、效度较好，达到了心理测量学的要求，适合我国多发性硬化患者的生存质量评价。
Objective To translate and adapt the multiple sclerosis quality of life-54 questionnaire and evaluate the reliability and validity of this scale. Methods Using translation, back-translation, cross-cultural adaptation and protest we got the adaptation of the scale. Thirty multiple sclerosis patients were examined by the Chinese version of the scale, arid their data were used to evaluate reliability and validity of the scale. Results The evaluation of the reliability of the scale showed the test-retest correlation coefficients of total scale and 13 aspects were above 0.7, the Cronbach of total scales and 12 aspects were above 0.7, the split-half coefficients was O. 96. The evaluation of validity of this scale showed the construct validity was good as indicated by factor analysis. Except health perceptions aspect, other aspects showed significant correlation to total scale （ r = 0.40 -0.84 ） ;the correlation coefficient of criteria validity was 0. 98. Except sexual function and satisfaction with sexual function aspects, there were statistical differences in aspect scores of this scale between multiple sclerosis patients and normal persons. Conclusion The reliability and validity of Chinese version of the multiple sclerosis quality of life-54 questionnaire are good enough for meeting psychometric standard, and can be applied to assess quality of life for patients with multiple sclerosis in China.
出处
《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2009年第4期375-377,共3页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词
多发性硬化
生存质量
信度
效度
Multiple sclerosis
Quality of life
Reliability
Validity
