摘要
最高人民法院最近将"调判结合"作为民事审判工作的指导方针。根据民事审判结构理论,该政策恰当地回应了社会转型过程中和谐社会与法治社会的基本要求,而调解与判决之间的矛盾性,使得调判结合同时陷于外部合理性与内部矛盾性的困境,而这根源于更深层次上和谐社会与法治社会的同样困境,这导致了法院有意无意地倾向于强化调解。如果不对此种动向保持警惕,我们很可能重蹈覆辙。
The Supreme Court recently promulgated “the combination of mediation and judgment” as the guiding principle of civil judiciary. According to the theory of civil judicial structure, the policy is a proper reaction to the basic demand of a society that stresses harmony and the rule of law. However, the innate contradiction between mediation and judgment plunges the apparently rational policy into a dilemma. This dilemma is synonymous with the more profound dilemma between a society with enforced harmony and a society that is governed by the rule of law. The result is, the court tends to put mediation before judgment. If such a tendency is not checked, we will very likely fall back into the old track of legal disorder.
出处
《开放时代》
CSSCI
2009年第6期98-115,共18页
Open Times
基金
西南政法大学2005年度司法研究项目"法院的纠纷解决与司法现代化"(A0506)最终成果
