摘要
在服务理念的指引下,为更好地实现行政任务,行政机关及其他承担行政任务的主体通过行使程序裁量,自主地确定规范之外的程序形式与种类。"万元大奖下的暂住证登记"就是典型个案。程序裁量的运作,模糊了行政功能的绝对划分界限,打破了严格法律保留原则的适用前提;形成了多项行政行为共谋行政目标的现象,彰显了单一行政行为形式作为行政法学分析工具的不足。对这类新型行政活动的分析,除了遵守法律已有的界限外,也应关照行政目的的引导作用,并将多个行政行为构成的整个行政过程视为一幅动态的行政法律关系图式,在互动、多元的关系中探讨行政机关及其他承担行政任务的主体、行政相对人的复合法律地位。
The concept of service government has gradually been universal after the high--tide of the western countries＇ Reinventing Government Movements since 1980. Under the guidance of service idea, administrative organ and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks determine the forms and types of procedure with discretion in order to accomplish the administrative tasks better. On the one hand, the exercises of procedure discretion make a fuzzy bound between different administrative functions, and also destroy the application premises of the strict principle of legal reservation. In modern administration, intervention administration and supply administration often cooperate with each other perfectly to accomplish the hard administrative tasks flexibly. So it is unadvisable to defend the traditional absolute differentiation between intervention administration and supply administration and to apply the strict principle of legal reservation. On the other hand, the exercises of procedure discretion generate a new phenomenon that several administrative actions achieve one administrative target, which disclose the deficiency of the single administrative action form as the main analytical mean in administrative law. Hence the traditional theory of administrative law, which stereotypes administrative action and then judges its legality according to its constitutive requirements, will obstruct the dynamic administrative process artificially, and will obstruct the court to consider the whole and compound administrative actions comprehensively. To analyze this new type of administrative activity, we should not only abide by the law, but also pay attention to the guidance of the administrative purpose, which requires us to consider the whole administrative process with several administrative actions as dynamic administrative legal relationship, and to explore the compound legal status of administrative organs and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks and administrative counterparts in interactive and pluralistic relationship. The legality of each administrative action should also be judged in dynamic administrative legal relationship.
出处
《法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第3期94-102,共9页
Chinese Journal of Law
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“协商行政的原理与制度研究”(批准号07CFX013)的阶段性成果
浙江工商大学青年人才基金资助(项目编号Q09-4)
关键词
服务型政府
程序裁量
法律保留
复合行政法律关系
procedure discretion, service idea, purpose reservation, compound administrative legal relationship
