期刊文献+

股骨颈骨折人工髋关节置换的偏心距调整(英文)

Eccentricity adjustment in artificial hip replacement for treatment of femoral neck fracture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:研究表明,股骨偏心距短缩会导致外展肌肌力下降,偏心距过大,则增加置换后股骨颈假体折断的风险及增加骨水泥型股骨柄假体骨鞘的压应力,使其易松动和下沉。目的:探讨高龄股骨颈骨折人工髋关节置换过程中偏心距调整的重要性。设计、时间及地点:观察性实验,病例来自2004-01/2005-12天津中医药大学第一附属医院骨科。对象:选择天津中医药大学第一附属医院骨科收治的股骨颈骨折患者30例,男12例,女18例,年龄62~90岁,平均73.8岁。方法:全部患者均实施了人工髋关节置换术(由同一组手术医师操作),术前利用X-Caliper仪器,仔细测量骨盆正位片中健侧股骨头旋转中心、髋关节旋转中心、颈干角、股骨的横向偏心距、外展力臂、重力力臂等,利用三角函数进行准确计算。确定截骨平面的角度,选择合适假体以及术中对于偏心距的调整,比较置换后与健侧的差异。主要观察指标:偏心距的数值及置换后关节功能。结果:30例患者术前健侧偏心距平均38.7mm(22~57mm),术后患侧偏心距平均39.2mm(21~59mm);健侧平均38.7mm。术后肢体不等长范围1.8~8.7mm,平均3.4mm,患侧肢体长者26例,占86.7%,短者4例,占13.3%。术后随访0.5~2.5年,根据Harris评分标准,优10例,良19例,可1例,优良率达97%。结论:股骨颈骨折人工关节置换中偏心距的合适与否与置换后关节功能密切相关。 BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that shortening of femoral eccentricity would lead to decreased abductor muscle strength, and overlengthening eccentricity would increase the risk of femoral neck prosthesis fracture and the compressive stress of cemented femoral stem prosthesis after artificial hip replacement, which easily causes prosthetic loosening and subsidence. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the importance of eccentricity adjustment in the artificial hip replacement for treatment of femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: An observational study was performed at the Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2004 and December 2005. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 30 patients with femoral neck fracture, 12 males and 18 females, averaging 73.8 years of age (range 62-90 years old), received treatment at the Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and were recruited into this study. METHODS: All patients underwent artificial hip replacement operated by the same team of surgeons. Prior to surgery, some indices on the uninjured side were determined through the anteroposterior radiographs of pelvis using X-Caliper measurement tool, including rotation center of femoral head, rotation center of hip joint, collodiaphyseal angre, femoral transverse eccentricity, abduction moment arm, and moment arm of gravity. These indices were precisely calculated using trigonometric function. The angle of osteotomy plane was determined. Proper prosthesis was selected and eccentricity was adjusted. Following artificial hip placement, a comparison was made between uninjured and injured sides. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eccentricity and hip joint function. RESULTS: The eccentricity on uninjured side of 30 patients averaged 38.7 mm (range 22 57 mm) prior to surgery and that on the injured side averaged 39.2 mm (range 21 59 mm) after surgery. Limb discrepancy ranged 1.8-8.7 mm, with a mean of 3.4 mm, after surgery. There were 26 patients (86.7%) presenting long limbs and 4 patients (13.3%) showing short limbs after surgery. All patients were followed-up 0.5 2.5 years old. Harris hip score results were excellent in 10 patients, good in 19 patients, and fair in 1 patient, with an excellent and good rate of 97%. CONCLUSION: In treatment of femoral neck fracture, eccentricity adjustment during artificial hip replacement is closely associated with hip joint function after surgery.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第22期4369-4373,共5页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献28

  • 1Lindgren JU, Rysavy J. Restoration of femoral offset during hip replacement[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 1992,63:407 ~ 410.
  • 2Conn KS,Clarke MT,Hallett JP. A simple guide to determine the magnification of radiographs and to improve the accuracy of preoperative templating[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br) ,2002,84:269 ~ 272.
  • 3Rorabeck CH, Bourne BR. Soft tissue balancing of the hip: A concept which has come of age[R]. Presented at the 70th annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. New Orleans, LA,2003.
  • 4Bourne BR,Rorabeck CH. Soft tissue balancing: The hip [J]. J Arthroplasty ,2002,17 (Suppl): 17 ~ 22.
  • 5Davey JR,OConnor DO,Burke DW,et al. Femoral component offset:ts effect on strain in bone-cement[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1993,8:23 ~26.
  • 6Charnley J. Low friction principle [M]. In: Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. New york:Springer-Verlag, 1979, 3 ~ 15.
  • 7McGrory B J, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, et al. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Bone J Surg(Br), 1995,77:865 ~ 869.
  • 8Asayama I, Naito M, Fujisawa M, et al. Relationship between radiographic measurements of reconstructed hip joint position and the Trendelenburg sign [J]. J Arthroplasty,2002,17:747 ~ 751.
  • 9Brand RA,Yach HJ.Effects of leg length discrepancies on the force at the hip joint[J].Clin Orthop,1996,(333):172-180.
  • 10Edeen J,Sharkey PF,Alexander AH.Clinical significance of leg-length inequality after total hip arthroplasty[J].Am J Orthop,1995,24:347-351.

共引文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部