期刊文献+

航空国际私法领域中弱者利益保护问题初探 被引量:2

An Analysis of the Protection of the Interests of the Weak Parties in Private International Air Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 21世纪国际航空运输已成为各国人员和货物流动的主要方式,一旦发生航空事故常常伴随着机毁人亡的灾难性后果。作为消费者的旅客和托运人这一弱势群体利益的保护和救济便成为人们关注的焦点和司法实践的主要问题之一。本文主要对航空私法领域中弱者利益保护的必要性、保护的方法和公约的立法方面作初步探讨。 International air transportation has become a major means for people to travel and for goods to be delivered worldwide in the 21 st century. However, once an air accident happens, it will cause catastrophic destruction. Naturally, how to protect the interests of consumers, or passengers and consignors, the vulnerable group, becomes victims' focus of concern and one of the major issues in judicial practice. This article makes an analysis of the protection of the weak parties in terms of necessity, protection methods and the legislation related to the convention.
作者 张超汉
出处 《北京政法职业学院学报》 2009年第2期56-59,共4页 Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词 航空私法 弱者保护 人文关怀 实质公平 private air law protection of the weak parties humanistic concerns material equity
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献21

同被引文献35

  • 1曾令良.现代国际法的人本化发展趋势[J].中国社会科学,2007(1):89-103. 被引量:167
  • 2张海燕.产品责任法律制度研究[M]//梁慧星.民商法论丛:第29卷.北京:法律出版社.2004:541.
  • 3王瀚,孙玉超.Status, problems and challenges in the air law teaching and theoretical research in China: Based on the comparative analysis of air law teaching and theoretical research in China and the western countries[J].US-China Law Review,2007,4(6):53-64. 被引量:3
  • 4朱艳.包头空难诉讼4年终立案.遇难者家属索赔1.23亿[N].新京报,2009-08-12(3).
  • 5Sonja A Soehnel. Product liabihty:personal injury or death allegedly caused by defect in aircraft or its parts, supplies, or equipment[R]. American Law Reports, third edition, 2009.
  • 6李斌.俄米格系列飞机命运没落制造商有破产危机[EB/OL].(2010-05-23)[2010-07-01].hup://news.sohu.com/91/31/news212933191.shtml.
  • 7梁慧星.论产品制造者、销售者的严格责任[C]∥梁慧星.民法学说判例与立法研究.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1993:128-146.
  • 8Diederiks-Verschoor. An introduction to air law[M]. Kluwer Law International, 1997,6th ed : 111.
  • 9张海燕.产品责任法律制度研究[C]//梁慧星.民商法论丛(第29卷).北京:法律出版社,2004:568.
  • 10Bruce v. Martin - Marietta Corp. and Ozark Airlines, US Court of Appeals(10th Circuit), Sept 24, 1976; Avi, Vol 14, pp. 17,472.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部