期刊文献+

欧盟环境规制对我国纺织品与服装出口的绿色壁垒效应——基于我国四种纺织品与服装出口欧盟11国的面板数据分析:1990—2006 被引量:3

The Green Barrier of Trade Effect of EU's Environmental Regulations on Textile and Clothing Exported from China Based on Panel Data Analysis on China's Four Types of Textile and Clothing Exported to Eleven of the EU Member Countries: 1990-2006
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文采用引力模型,对1990—2006年我国短纤混纺布、棉制男衬衫、合成纤维制男式西服套装、棉制其他袜等四种纺织品和服装对欧盟11国的年度出口值进行面板数据分析,合并考察欧盟有关纺织品与服装的一揽子环境规制措施对我国纺织品与服装出口是否产生壁垒效应。本文拓展出环境规制严度变量的纵向赋值法,按规制措施对纺织品与服装出口影响强弱对环境规制严度变量赋予不同的增幅,在时间序列数据中对先后实施多项不同种类的环境规制措施如何进行计量分析的问题取得突破。本文指出,引力模型的变量设定要反映所考察产品的特殊性,并设定两个虚拟变量以反映我国纺织品与服装出口所特有的受配额限制的三个阶段。结果显示:欧盟有关纺织品与服装的一揽子环境规制措施对我国四种纺织品与服装的出口已构成绿色贸易壁垒。这一结果为欧盟环境规制构成绿色壁垒的论断提供了经验分析的证据。 By using gravity model, panel data analysis is conducted for China's blended staple fiber cloth, cotton shirts for men, synthetic fiber suit for men, and miscellaneous cotton socks exported to eleven of the European Union (EU) member countries from the year of 1990 to 2006, in order to investigate whether EU's environmental regulation package has green barrier of trade effect on China's export of textile and clothing (TC). An approach of vertically assigned value is developed by the authors for stringency of environmental regulations (SER), and the SER is assigned various values added according to the strength of the impact of environmental regulation on TC export, and hence a breakthrough has been achieved regarding the econometric analysis in time series on more than one environmental regulation measures of different types adopted at different time. It's pointed out by the authors that the variable setting must reflect the characteristic of the questioned products, and two dummies are set to reflect the three phases of quota restriction particularly against China's TC export. The result shows that the questioned EU's environmental regulation measures has constituted green barrier of trade to the questioned TC exported from China. An evidence based on empirical test is provided by this result to support the argument that EU's environmental regulations do constitute green barrier of trade.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期130-140,共11页 China Industrial Economics
基金 2008年教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目"战略性环境政策的贸易效应:理论与实证分析及我国的对策研究"(批准号OSJHQ0047) 华中科技大学2008年"教学质量工程"第二批教学研究项目"经济学科本科生科研支持与服务研究"(立项通知文号校教[2008]42号)
关键词 欧盟环境规制 绿色贸易壁垒 中国纺织品与服装出口 EU's environmental regulation green barrier of trade China's export of textile and clothing
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Baleix, J. M. Quotas on Clothing Imports: Impact and Determinants of EU Trade Policy [J]. Review of International Economies, 2005,13, (3).
  • 2Mulatu, A.,Florax,Raymond J.G.M. and Withagen, Cees A.A.M. Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: A Meta-Analysis of International Trade Studies[R]. The Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2001.
  • 3Otsuki, T., Wilsont, J.S., Sewadeh, M. A Race to the Top? A Case Study of Food Safety Standards and African Exports[R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2563,2001.
  • 4Tobey, J.A. The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test[J]. Kyklos, 1990, (43).
  • 5van Beers, C., and van den Bergh, J. An Empirical Multi-country Analysis of the Impact of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Trade Flows[J]. Kyklos,1997, (50).
  • 6van Beers, C., van den Bergh, J. The Impact of Environmental Policy on Foreign Trade: Tobey Revisited with a Bilateral Flow Model[R]. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper,2000.
  • 7Walter, I.,and Ugelow, J. Environmental Policies in Developing Countries[J]. Ambio, 1979, (8).
  • 8Xu, Xinpeng. International Trade and Environmental Regulation: Time Series Evidence and Cross Section Test [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2000,(17).
  • 9桂家祥.绿色纺织品与行业对策[J].中国纺织经济,2000,7(1):46-52. 被引量:7
  • 10顾国达,牛晓婧,张钱江.技术壁垒对国际贸易影响的实证分析——以中日茶叶贸易为例[J].国际贸易问题,2007(6):74-80. 被引量:99

二级参考文献24

共引文献307

同被引文献39

  • 1廖玫,王瑾.外国环境规制对中国纺织品出口贸易影响的实证研究[J].江苏商论,2007(7):78-80. 被引量:5
  • 2叶继革,余道先.我国出口贸易与环境污染的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2007(5):72-77. 被引量:59
  • 3TOBEY. The effects of domestic environment policies on patterns of world trade : an empirical test [ J ]. Kyklos, 1990, 43(2) : 191 -209.
  • 4BUSSE, MATTHIAS. Trade, environmental regulations and the world trade organization: new empirical evi- dence[ R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2004(3361 ).
  • 5Arrow K J. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing[J]. The Re- view of Economic Studies. 1962, 29(3) : 155-173.
  • 6Baier S L, Bergstrand J H. Estimating the effects of free trade agreements on international trade flows using matching econometrics [J]. Journal of International Economics. 2009, 77 (1) : 63-76.
  • 7Cai H, Liu Q. Competition and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Industrial Firms [J]. The Economic Journal. 2009, 119 (537) : 764-795.
  • 8Claessens S, Tzioumis K. Measuring Firms~ Access to Finance. Mimeo, World Bank and Brooking Conference Paper. 2006.
  • 9Hettige H, Huq M, Pargal S, et al. Determinants of Pollution Abatement in Developing Countries: Evidence from South and Southeast Asia[J]. World Devel- opment. 1996, 24( 12): 1891-1904.
  • 10Mukhopadhyay K. Impact of Trade on Energy Use and Environment in In- dia: An Input-output analysis: International conference "Input-output and General Equilibrium: Data, Modeling and Policy Analysis " [Z]. Brussels: the Free University of Brussels, 2004.

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部