期刊文献+

钛夹处理内镜下黏膜切除术后创面62例 被引量:10

Titanium Clips in the Treatment of Defects Caused by Endoscopic Mucosal Resection:Report of 62 Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨内镜下黏膜切除(endoscopic mucosal resection,EMR)术后钛夹夹闭创面,对防止并发症及促进创面愈合的效果。方法对62例直径≤15mm的食管、胃肠隆起性病变行EMR治疗,共切除69处病变,术后创面均应用钛夹处理,评价术中及术后的并发症情况,术后6周复查内镜,观察创面愈合情况。结果62例69处病变均完整切除,无残留病变,1~3枚钛夹夹闭创面,无出血、穿孔等并发症,6周后复查内镜,创面均达到愈合标准,65处病变的钛夹脱落,均无溃疡、复发及狭窄。结论EMR术后钛夹夹闭创面操作简单,安全,治疗效果好。 Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of titanium clips occlusion for the defects and complications caused by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Methods Totally 62 patients with protuberant lesions in the esophagus or gastrointestinal tract (≤〈 15 mm in diameter) were treated by EMR in our hospital. During the operation, 69 lesions were cut and the surgical defects were clipped using titanium clips. The intra- and post-operative complications of the patients were reviewed. Six weeks after the treatment, the patients received re-examination by endoscopy to observe the healing of the mucosal defects. Results The 69 lesions in the 62 cases were resected completely. At each defect, 1 - 3 titanium clips were used, no perforation or hemorrhage occurred in the patients. Endoscopy performed in 6 weeks showed that all the defects were healed without ulcer, stenosis or recurrence. The titanium clips dropped 65 of the defected mucosa. Conclusion Titanium clips is effective and safe for defects caused by endoscopic mucosal resection.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2009年第6期535-537,共3页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 内镜下黏膜切除术 黏膜隆起性病变 钛夹夹闭创面 Endoscopic mucosal resection Mucosal protuberant lesion Titanium clips
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1汪芳裕,朱人敏,刘炯,张晓华,许文安,金鑫鑫.内镜下黏膜切除术治疗结直肠肿瘤[J].解放军医学杂志,2005,30(6):469-471. 被引量:16
  • 2Guillou P J, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short - term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer ( MRC CLASICC trial) : muhicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2005,365 : 1718 - 1726.
  • 3The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med ,2004,350:2050 - 2059.
  • 4Watabe H, Yamaji Y, Okamoto M, et al. Risk assessment for delayed hemorrhagic complication of colonic polypectomy: polyp-related factoers and patient-related factors. Grastrointest Endosc, 2006,64 (1) :73 -78.
  • 5Betes Ibanez M, Munoz-Navas MA, Duque JM,et al. Diagnostic value of distal colonic polyps for prediction of advanced proximal neoplasia in an average-risk population undergoing screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc ,2004,59 ( 6 ) :634 - 631.
  • 6Parra-Blanco A, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Nicolas-Perez D, et al. Risk for high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma in colorectal flat adenomas in a Spanish population. Gastroenterol Hepatol,2006,29 (10) :602 -609.
  • 7Jameel JK, Pillinger SH, Moncur P, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the management of large colo-rectal polyps. Colorectal Dis ,2006,8 ( 6 ) :497 - 500.
  • 8Kudo S, Kashida H, Tamura T, et al. Colonoscopic diagnosis and management of nonpolypoid early colorectal cancer. World J Surg, 2000,24(9) :1081 - 1090.
  • 9Rathgaber SW,Wick TM. Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice. Gastrointest Endosc, 2006,64 (4) :555 - 562.
  • 10Church JM. Experience in the endoscopic management of large colonic polyps. ANZ J Surg,2003,73 ( 12 ) : 988 - 995.

共引文献83

同被引文献49

引证文献10

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部