期刊文献+

非ST段抬高型与ST段抬高型急性心肌梗塞冠脉造影病变的对比 被引量:3

Compare of results of coronary angiography in non-ST-elevation and ST-elevation myocardial infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较非ST段抬高型与ST段抬高型急性心肌梗塞(AMI)病人冠状动脉血管造影结果。方法:回顾分析我院接受冠脉造影的268例AMI患者的资料,患者被分为A、B两组:A组为非ST段抬高型AMI(NSTE-MI),共148例,B组为ST段抬高型AMI(STEMI),共120例。结果:非ST段抬高型AMI组冠脉造影病变的血管数及血管狭窄程度明显高于ST段抬高型AMI组的(P<0.01)。4年随访中NSTEMI组死亡19例(12.8%),STEMI组死亡9例(7.5%),NSTEMI组死亡率显著高于STEMI组(P<0.01)。结论:非ST段抬高型AMI的病情较ST段抬高型AMI更重。 Objective: To compare the results of coronary angiography in non-- ST--elevation and ST--elevation myocardial infarction. Methods: The 268 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were randomly divided into group A [non--ST--segment elevation AMI (NSTEMI), 148 cases] and group B [ST--segment elevation AMI (STEMI), 120 cases]. The data of coronary angiography was analyzed and compared between two groups. Results: The vascular stenosis degree and the number of blood vessel with lesion by coronary angiography in group A was more than those of group B (P〈0.01). The mortality of NSTEMI group (12.8%) was more than that of STEMI group (7.5 %), P〈0.01. Conclusion: The patients condition of non--ST--elevation AMI is more severe than ST--elevation AMI.
作者 周秋杰
出处 《心血管康复医学杂志》 CAS 2009年第3期232-233,共2页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 心肌梗塞 冠状血管造影 心电描记术 Myocardial infarction coronary angiography Electrocardiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1程训民,何国祥,仝识非,冉擘力,刘建平,姚青,宋治远.冠状动脉造影指标对中度狭窄病变功能意义的判断价值[J].第三军医大学学报,2004,26(24):2261-2263. 被引量:4
  • 2Abbas A E, Boura J A, Brewington S D, et al. Acute angiographic analysis of non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2004, 94(7): 907-909.
  • 3Singh M, Ting H H, Gersh B J, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgical capability [J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 2004, 79(6): 738-744.
  • 4Goodman S G, Fitchett D, Armstrong P W, et al. Randomized evaluation of the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes receiving the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide [J]. Circulation, 2003, 107(2): 238-244.
  • 5Roe M T, Parsons L S, Pollack C V Jr, et al. Quality of care by classification of myocardial infarction: treatment patterns for ST-segment elevation vs non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2005, 165(14): 1630-1636.
  • 6Yellon D M, Dana A. The preconditioning phenomenon: A tool for the scientist or a clinical reality [J]? Circ Res, 2000, 87(7): 543-550.
  • 7Tzivoni D. Myocardial preconditioning in humans [J]. Isr Med Assoc J, 2000, 2(5): 393-396.
  • 8Schwarz E R, Reffelmann T, Kloner R A. Clinical effects of ischemic preconditioning [J]. Curr Opin Cardiol, 1999, 14(4): 340-348.
  • 9Schlaifer J D, Kerensky R A. Ischemic preconditioning: clinical relevance and investigative studies[J]. Clin Cardiol, 1997, 20(7): 602-606.
  • 10Buckberg G D. Commonality of ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy: laplace and ventricular restoration [J]. J Card Surg, 1999, 14(1): 53-59.

共引文献32

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部