摘要
目的比较单纯Bobath手法治疗和头针结合Bobath治疗脑卒中后痉挛的临床疗效。方法将60例患者随机分为实验组（30例）和对照组（30例）。实验组头针结合Bobath治疗，对照组常规Bobath手法治疗，比较两组治疗后效果。结果实验组抗痉挛效果优于对照组，改良Ashworth分级法评分明显低于对照组，而且实验组临床疗效与对照组比较，差异有显著性意义（P〈0．05）。结论头针结合Bobath治疗脑卒中后痉挛，疗效优于单纯Bobath手法治疗。
Objective To observe the clinical effects of reducing post-stroke spasticity by Bobath alone and by combinative therapy of scalp acupuncture and Bobath. Methods Sixty patients were equally randomized into two groups： one group was treated with combinative therapy of scalp acupuncture and Bobath, and the other group was treated with Bobath alone as a control. Results The results of Modified Ashworth Scale showed that spasticity was improved more obvious in patients treated with the combinative therapy than that in patients treated with Bobath alone. In addition, the clinical effect of combinative therapy was significantly different from that of Bobath alone with P less than 0.05. Conclusion Combinative therapy with scalp acupuncture and Bobath is more effective than Bobth alone in improving post-stroke spasticity.
出处
《老年医学与保健》
CAS
2009年第3期184-185,共2页
Geriatrics & Health Care
