摘要
目的观察浮针疗法对膝骨关节炎性疼痛患者的治疗效果。方法选择膝骨关节炎性疼痛的患者60例,随机分为2组：消炎镇痛药组（A组）,浮针疗法组（F组）,每组30例。采用视觉模拟评分法（VAS）,分别测定治疗前、治疗后和治疗后3个月的VAS评分、伴随症状的改善和并发症,从而评估2种方法的疗效和安全性。结果治疗后两组的VAS评分均较治疗前有显著性降低（P〈0.01）,治疗后3个月F组较A组的VAS评分显著低。胃肠道不良反应,A组较F组显著。结论两种治疗方法对膝骨关节炎性疼痛均有明显的缓解效果,但浮针疗法镇痛效果更持久。
Objectives To investigate the effect of float subcutanelus needle（Fu＇ s, FSN） for treating the knee osteoarthritis pain. Methods Sixty patients with knee osteoarthritis pain were selected and divided randomly into two groups： anti-inflammatory and analgesic treatment group （group A,n= 30）, FSN treatment group（group F, n = 30）. VAS of pre-treatment, post-treatment and after threemonths were recorded respectively, and also the relief of symptoms and complications then the efficacy and safety of the two kinds of treatments were assessed. Results After treatment, the VAS in the two groups was significant improvement. After three months, the VAS in group F was remarkably lower and persistently longer than that in group A, and the gastrointestinal adverse reactions was also lower in group F,VAS was on the contrary. Conclusion Both treatment methods can effectively relieve the pain of the knee osteoarthritis, moreover, the effect of FSN can maintain longer.
出处
《实用疼痛学杂志》
2009年第3期195-196,共2页
Pain Clinic Journal
关键词
浮针
消炎药
非甾类
骨关节疼痛
膝
镇痛药
Float Needle
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
Analgesics
