期刊文献+

Simplified stiffness-based approach for seismic performance evaluation of moment-resisting frame

基于刚度的框架结构抗震能力评估简化方法(英文)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Based on the concept of stiffness degradation, a damage index of the whole frame and the storey is proposed for the frame seismic performance evaluation. The index is compatible with the non-linear static analysis (e. g. the pushover analysis), and the structural damage is considered via plastic hinges. Simultaneously, a practical approach is developed to obtain the relationships between the proposed index and earthquake intensities based on the capacity spectrum method. The proposed index is then illustrated through two low-rise reinforced concrete frames, and it is also compared with some other indices. The results indicate that the proposed index is on the safe side and not sensitive to the lateral load pattern. The storey index is helpful to reflect the storey damage and to uncover the position of the weak storey. Finally, the relationship between performance levels and damage index values is also proposed through statistical analysis for the performance-based seismic evaluation. 针对结构物在地震作用下的灾害评估问题,提出了一种基于刚度退化概念的框架结构整体与层间损伤指标.该指标通过结构静力弹塑性分析方法进行计算,利用塑性铰考虑结构的地震损伤.同时,根据能力谱方法建立了该损伤指标与抗震设防等级的关系.然后,将建议指标应用于2个3层钢筋混凝土框架结构,并与其他损伤指标进行了对比.结果表明:建议的损伤指标偏于安全,且对静力弹塑性分析的水平荷载模式不敏感;层间损伤指标能够清晰地反映各楼层的损伤情况,从而判断薄弱层的位置.最后,通过统计分析给出了结构不同性能水准与损伤指标的对应关系,为基于性能的框架结构抗震评估提供参考.
出处 《Journal of Southeast University(English Edition)》 EI CAS 2009年第2期241-246,共6页 东南大学学报(英文版)
基金 The National Basic Research Program of China(973 Program)(No.2007CB714200)
关键词 damage index seismic evaluation capacity spectrum method FRAME lateral load pattern pushover analysis performance level stiffness degradation 损伤指标 抗震评估 能力谱法 框架 水平荷载模式 pushover分析 性能水准 刚度退化
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1Applied Technology Council. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete building[R].Report ATC-40, 1996.
  • 2FEMA273, FEMA274. NEHRP Commentary on the guidelines for the rehabilitation of building[R]. Washington D C: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1996.
  • 3krawinklar H. Pushover analysis: Why, How, and When not to use it[A]. Proceedings of SEAOC 65th Annual Convention[C]. HAWAII:Structural Engineering Association of California, MAUI, 1996.
  • 4Kicher C A. Capacity spectrum Pushover method: Seeing is Believing[A]. Proceedings of SEAOC 65th Annual Convention[C]. HAWAII:Structural Engineering Association of California, MAUI, 1996.
  • 5Chopro A K, Goel R K. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF Systems[R]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No: PEER-1999/02, University of Califormia at Berkeley, 1999.
  • 6Helmut krawinklar, G D P K. Seneviratna. Pros and Cons of a Pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation[J]. Engineering Structures, 1998, 20:452-464.
  • 7Peter Fajfar. Simple Push-over analysis of building structures[A]. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C]. 1996.
  • 8A S Moghadam. Pushover analysis for asymmetric and set-bace multi-story buildings[A]. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C]. 2000.
  • 9Misael Requena. Evaluation of a simplified method for the determination of the nonlinear seismic response of RC frames[A]. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C]. 2000.
  • 10Fajfar P, Fischinger M. N2-a method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular structures[A]. Proceedings 9th world conferfence Earthquake Engineering[C]. Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 1988,5: 111-116.

共引文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部