期刊文献+

“AS认知方式”:隐喻等机制的统一解释——十五论语言的体验性 被引量:13

"AS Mode of Cognition":A Unified Explanation of Analogous Mechanisms in Language——The 15th Paper on Language Embodiment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语言中的明喻反映了现实世界中事体间的相似关系,这些明喻背后存在的"AS认知方式"比隐喻机制更为始源和明了。该认知方式可用来统一解释认知语言学中述及的隐喻、转喻、范畴化、识解、概念整合等机制,还可解释构式网络及认知过程中的方向性,能进一步简化理论描述,并为统一分析语言各层面提供了一条重要思路。"AS认知方式"体现了认知的人本性,是语言象似性的基础,还是人类丰富想象力的源泉,或许也是人类赖以生存的一种最根本的元认知策略。 Similes in language suggest likeness and analogy between things in reality. The "AS Mode of Cognition" behind these similes is perhaps more primitive and apprehensible than metaphor as a cognitive mechanism. The mode affords a unified explanation for cognitive strategies like metaphor, metonymy, categorization, construal, conceptual blending, as weU as for the directionality in construction networks and cognitive process. Analysis in this regard can simplify theory, providing an important way for a unified explanation across different levels in language. AS Mode represents humanism in cognitive linguistics, being the basis for iconicity, the original source of imagination, and a fundamental meta-cognitive strategy which we live by.
作者 王寅 王天翼
出处 《解放军外国语学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期1-6,共6页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
关键词 体验哲学 认知语言学 明喻成语 AS认知方式 构式网络 Embodied Philosophy cognitive linguistics simile idioms AS Mode of cognition construction networks
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1王寅.认知语言学之我见[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2004,27(5):1-5. 被引量:100
  • 2王寅.“As X As Y构造”的认知研究——十论语言的体验性[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2007,30(4):7-13. 被引量:20
  • 3严辰松.从“年方八十”说起再谈构式[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2008,31(6):1-5. 被引量:27
  • 4Croft,William.Radical Construction Grammar:Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective[M].Oxford:OUP,2001.
  • 5Croft,William & D.Alan Cruse.Cognitive Linguistics[M].Cambridge:CUP,2004.
  • 6Fauconnier,Gilles.Mental Spaces:Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language[M].Cambridge,MA and London:MIT Press/Bradford,1985.
  • 7Fauconnier,Gilles.Mappings in Thought and Language[M].Cambridge:CUP,1997.
  • 8Lakoff,G.& M.Johnson.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago and London:University of Chicago Press,1980.
  • 9Lakoff,G.& M.Johnson.Philosophy in the Flesh-The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought[M].New York:Basic Books,1999.
  • 10Langacker,Ronald W.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar,Vol.1,Theoretical Prerequisites[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press,1987.

二级参考文献37

  • 1王寅.“现实—认知—语言”三因素间的反映与对应滤减现象[J].外国语文,1998,23(3):71-76. 被引量:28
  • 2严辰松.构式语法论要[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2006,29(4):6-11. 被引量:212
  • 3Croft, W. Radical Construction Grammar [ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • 4Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse. Cognitive linguistics [ M]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004. 276.
  • 5Croft, W. Construction grammar and usage-based model [ C ] // D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyekens. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2007 : 499 - 510.
  • 6Fillmore, C., P. Kay & M. O'Connor. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical conditions: the case of LET ALONE [J]. Language, 1988, 64:501-538.
  • 7Goldberg, A. E. Construction: A new theoretical approach to language [ J ]. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2003, 7 (5) : 219 -224.
  • 8Langacker, R. W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol.Ⅰ) [M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
  • 9Langacker, R. W. Constructions and Constructional Meaning [ R ]. Plenary Lecture at First UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference : New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, October 23^rd-25^th, 2005, Brighton, UK.
  • 10Lamb, Sidney. Pathways of the Brain: The Neurocognitive Basis of Language [ M ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,1998.

共引文献144

同被引文献249

引证文献13

二级引证文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部