摘要
柏拉图面对的挑战对于政治学是根本性的理论问题。智者认为没有人能够证明无权无势的正义者幸福而不义者不幸福,不义者只要通过最大的不义以权谋私就能获得超乎寻常的"强者幸福"。柏拉图在回答中,首先调换了"正义"的含义,结果他所得出的所谓真正正义("内在正义")对于许多人来说显得恰恰是"不义",是灵魂中的理性压制欲望和政治中的君主集权等级精英制;这令民主派愤怒。而柏拉图又认为掌权者应当是哲人,这自然又令贵族派愤怒。在得罪了几乎所有人之后,柏拉图却又证明大权在手的哲人在"正义的国度"中也不幸福。由于现时代中相信智者的"聪明人"越来越多,柏拉图的政治哲学工作究竟是否令人信服,就不仅有学术的意义,而且有现实意义,值得人们的深入思考。
The challenge that Plato has been facing is a fundamental theoretical problem. Sophists think no one can prove that people of justice without power and influence are happy and people who are not justice are not happy. In answering this question, first Plato exchanged the implication of justice,as a result, the so - called real justice that he gained, namely intrinsic justice, is exactly unjust for many people. Plato thank that the man controlling power should be a philosopher, but the philosopher is also unhappy in the country of justice. For the wise persons who believing sophists are more and more, it has not only significance of science but also significance of reality that Plato＇s political task is convinced or not.
出处
《伦理学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期73-79,共7页
Studies in Ethics
关键词
正义
幸福论
强者政治学
justice theory of happiness politics of the strong man
