摘要
目的:观察小切口阑尾切除术与电子腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析316例急性阑尾炎病人资料。结果:两种术式切口均小于3 cm,手术时间相近,术中出血量4～6 ml,术后疼痛轻,平均住院5天左右。由于需用特殊设备以及部分病人不能耐受气腹而采用全麻,腹腔镜阑尾切除术组病人费用相对偏高。结论:小切口阑尾切除术及电子腹腔镜阑尾切除术均是治疗急性阑尾炎的有效微创术式,可根据病人的需要及医生的技术熟练程度加以选择。
Objective ：To compare the clinical efficacy of small-incision appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods：A retrospective study including 316 cases of acute appendicitis was performed. Results：Two kinds of surgical incision were smaller than 3 cm,the operative time was similar with less blood loss （4-6 ml）,light postoperative pain and rapid recovery and hospital stay about 5 d. As the special equipment needed, as well as some patients could not tolerate pneumoperitoneum,the general anesthesia was adopted ,laparoscopic appendectomy patients had relatively high cost. Conclusion：Small incision appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy are effective minimally invasive surgical procedures in the treatment of acute appendicitis. According to the needs of patients and doctors skill the operation type should be chosen.
出处
《现代医药卫生》
2009年第15期2271-2272,共2页
Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
关键词
小切口
腹腔镜
阑尾炎
Small incision
Laparoscopic
Appendicitis
