期刊文献+

石化行业控制室承爆风险评估方法研究 被引量:10

Study on Explosion Risk Assessment Method for Control Room in Petrochemical Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统的气体爆炸风险评估方法的不足之处,提出采用一种基于CFD技术的气体爆炸风险评估方法,对某煤气化厂区氢气爆炸对控制室造成的风险进行模拟计算与预测分析。并把研究结果与传统的TNT当量法、Multi-Energy方法预测结果进行比较。结果表明,该方法能考虑到密集管道与复杂装置布局、气云大小等因素对爆炸超压的影响,且能用于超压波的近场预测,以及确定空间不同位置处的爆炸超压,更适用于石化行业控制室的承爆风险评估。 A new method of explosion risk assessment for control room based on the CFD numerical simulation technology was studied because of the shortage of the traditional methods. The explosion risk of a coal gasification company's control room was analyzed and the simulation results using the new method and some traditional methods such as TNT equivalent and Multi-Energy method were compared and analyzed, which showed that the effect of the complexity of the equipment layout, gas cloud size and other factors in the factory on the explosion overpressure could be investigated using the new method and over-pressure of different locations which might be near or far from the explosion zones in the simulation space could be given. So the new method would be more suitable to application in the explosion risk analysis for the petro-chemical control room.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期129-134,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
关键词 控制室 爆炸评估 计算流体力学(CFD) TNT当量法 Multi-Energy法 control room explosion assessment computational fluid dynamics (CFD) TNT equivalent method Multi-Energy method
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1孟亦飞,蒋军成.化工装置火灾、爆炸、毒物扩散危险快速辨识方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(6):108-113. 被引量:12
  • 2路以宁.石油化工控制室抗爆设计要点[J].炼油技术与工程,2003,33(7):35-39. 被引量:2
  • 3B.H.Hjertager,I.Moen,J.H.S.Lee,B.K.Eckhoff,K.Fuhre,O.Krost.The influence of obstaclos on Flame propagation and pressure development in a large vented tube[R].CM1 Report No.803403 -2,Chr.Michelsen Institute,Bergen,Norway,1981
  • 4Baker W E.爆炸危险性及其评估[M].张国顺,译.北京:群众出版社,1988.
  • 5API-RP550[S],1986
  • 6Herrmann,D.D.,Improved vapor cloud explosion predictions by combining CFD modeling with the Baker-Strehlow method[A].International Conference and Workshop on Modeling the Consequence of Accidental Releases of Hazardous Materials[C].CCPS/MIChE,1999.9:479-494
  • 7Hansen,O.R.,Talberg,O.and Bakke,J.R.CFD-based methodelogy for quantitative gns explosion risk assessment in congested process areas:examples and validation status[A].International Conference and Workshop on Modeling the Consequence of Accidental Releases of Hazardous Materials[C].CCPS/MIChE,1999.9:457 -478
  • 8Windhorst,J.C.A..Deriving engineering specifications from release dispersion and CFD explosion[A].International Conference and Workshop on Modeling the Consequence of Accidental Releases of Hazardons Materials[C].CCPS/AIChE,1999.9:495-514
  • 9钱新明,刘振翼.液化石油气瓶站气体泄漏爆炸危险性研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2005,15(9):73-77. 被引量:7
  • 10P.Hoorelbeke,C.Izatt,J.R.Bakke,J.Renonh,R.W.Brewerton.Vapor cloud explosion analysis of onshore petrochemical facilities[A].American Society of Safety Engineers Middle East Chapter 7th Professional Development Conference & Exhibition Kingdom of Bahrain[C],2006.3:1-15

二级参考文献21

共引文献38

同被引文献57

引证文献10

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部