摘要
本文根据建窑的特点,提出判断建盏珍品的首要条件,并从工艺难度、实物存量、斑纹的本质与艺术效果三个方面的论述,否定了黑釉白斑盏是建窑珍品鹧鸪斑的观点。再从宋代对建盏分类问题的探讨和建窑油滴斑点的形成机理二个方面论证了建窑油滴即鹧鸪斑的结论。文中也详细介绍了建窑油滴与华北油滴的区别,并对中日两国古籍中建盏名称问题提出见解。
The most important rapirement to identity treasured Jian temmoku wares has been put forward in the paper based on the characteristics of Jian wares Also the atgument that white partridge spot black glazed ware is treasured Jian partridge spot temmoku bowl is refuted from the exposition of three aspects in technology difficulties, amount of the existing wares as well as the nature of partridge spot and its artistic effect. The conclusion that Jian oil spot tem moku bowl is Jian Partridge spot temmoku ware has been proven from both the discussion on the classification of Jian wares and the oil spot formation mechanism of Jian temmoku wares in song Dynasty. The paper also provides a de-tailed introduction to the differences between Jian oil spot temmoku ware and North china oil spot temmoku ware,and advances new ideas on the name of Jian temmoku ware recorded in ancient chinese and Japanese books.
出处
《陶瓷学报》
CAS
1998年第2期97-104,共8页
Journal of Ceramics
关键词
建窑
鹧鸪斑
油滴斑点
陶瓷制品
建盏
Jian temmoku ware, Partridge spot, oil spot, spot formation, classification of treasured wares