期刊文献+

肿瘤内科患者入住康复护理床位标准总原则的研究 被引量:3

Study on the General Principle of Admission Criteria of Rehabilitation Nursing Beds for Medical Oncology Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的制定肿瘤患者入住康复护理床位标准的总原则,确定肿瘤患者转诊分流的优先顺序。方法在文献回顾和对15名专家质性访谈及预试验的基础上.初步拟定专家函询问卷,应用Delphi技术对上海市20名肿瘤内科专家进行3轮问卷函询。结果肿瘤内科患者入住康复护理床位标准总原则的函询专家权威系数为0.8161,第三轮函询专家对一级条目意见的协调系数为0.6975、0.8637,二级条目变异系数0.0523-0.2934。二级奈目中,“营养不良患者”、“疼痛患者”和“最佳支持治疗作为推荐治疗的患者”的入住必要程度评分最高。结论专家对入住总原则的认可度高,意见相对集中,且专家的意见趋于一致,其中“营养不良,需要营养支持治疗”者、“疼痛,VAS评分≥7分,需要三级综合镇痛治疗”者和“最佳支持治疗作为推荐治疗的患者”应优先转诊. Objective To develop the general principle of admission criteria of rehabilitation nursing beds for medical oncology patients, and to determine patients'referral priority. Methods An initial semi-structured questionnaire was developed through literature review and semi-structured interviews. Twenty medical oncology experts in Shanghai were consulted through 3 rounds of correspondences, during which a Delphi method was used. Results The expert authority coefficient of the research was 0. 8161. After the 3rd round of correspondence, the expert coordinate coefficients of first level items were 0. 6975,0. 8637, and variation coeffi- cients of second level items ranged from 0. 0523 to 0. 2934. Among second level items, the scores of items of malnutrition patients, patients in pain and patients treated with best supportive methods as the recommended treatment were highest. Conclusion The experts have a high recognition about the general principle of admission criteria of rehabilitation nursing beds for medical oncology patients; their opinions were relatively consentaneous. Patients who have malnutrition and need nutritional therapy, who are in pain, the scores of VAS are greater than 7, and need Three-Step Analgesia therapy have the highest priority for admission to rehabilitation nursing beds.
出处 《护理学杂志》 2009年第15期1-4,共4页
基金 上海市卫生局资助项目(054167)
关键词 肿瘤 患者 康复护理床位 标准 德尔菲技术 tumor patients rehabilitation nursing bed criteria Delphi method
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献1

共引文献42

同被引文献39

  • 1王妍敏,张彩倩,吴茵茵,王憓,黄峥强,陈坤.信函和会议两种形式Delphi专家咨询的效果评价[J].浙江大学学报(医学版),2011,40(3):276-280. 被引量:14
  • 2郑林,吴明营,赵凤华,张燕搏,齐弘炜.血栓弹力图评价不同预充液对血小板功能的影响[J].中国体外循环杂志,2013,11(4):220-223. 被引量:4
  • 3刘晓红,何仲.德尔菲法在护理研究中的应用[J].中华护理教育,2005,2(1):6-8. 被引量:70
  • 4王洪恩,朱艳,程丽君.采用“床位利用模型”床位统一调配评估医院的工作效率[J].中国病案,2006,7(3):31-31. 被引量:4
  • 5LUDDINGTON RJ. Thrombelastography/thromboelastometry[J]. Clin Lab Haematol, 2005, 27(2) : 81 -90.
  • 6CHIRINOS VEGA JA, MUNOZ GOMEZ R, AMO PELAEZ M, et al. Portal and mesenteric thrombosis associated with protein S deficiency [ J 1- Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas, 2008, 100(2) : 104 - 107.
  • 7BLIDEN KP, DICHIARA J, TANTRY US, et al. Zncreased risk in patients with high platelet aggregation receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention:is the current antiplatelet therapy adequate [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2007, 49 (6) : 657 - 666.
  • 8RIYARD GE, BRUMMEL - ZIEDINS KE, MANN KG, et al. Evaluation of the profile of thrombin Generation during the process of whole blood clotting as assessed by thrombelastography [ J ] . Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2005. 3 (9) ~ 2039 - 2043.
  • 9DUBIN R, CUSHMAN M, FOLSOM AR, et al. Kidney function and multiple hemostatic markers: cross sectional associations in the multi- ethnic study of atherosclerosis[ J]. BMC Nephrol, 2011, 12(1): 1-8.
  • 10BOULKEDID R, ABDOUL H, LOUSTAU M, et al. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators i a systematic review [ J ]. PLoS One, 2011, 6 ( 6 ) : e20476.

引证文献3

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部