期刊文献+

面向模拟逼真度的仿真器平台结构参数优化 被引量:1

Simulation Fidelity Oriented Optimization of the Structural Parameters of a Simulator Platform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 仿真器平台的结构参数直接影响仿真器的模拟逼真度。根据平台机构尺寸参数确定仿真器平台最大线(角)位移,结合仿真载运工具实际运动信号辨识出相应洗出算法参数,从而求解出仿真器驾驶员运动感觉,构造人体运动感觉误差作为模拟逼真度衡量标准,在建立平台机构尺寸参数和模拟逼真度之间联系的基础上,提出面向模拟逼真度的仿真器平台结构参数优化方法。运用该方法对牵引动力国家重点实验室研制的高速列车驾驶仿真器进行优化设计。计算结果表明:结构参数优化后的仿真器平台运动充分利用了其工作空间;产生的仿真器驾驶员运动感觉误差较优化前降低了84.57%,显著地提高了模拟逼真度。 The structural parameters of a simulator plattorm directty affect me simulation fidelity of a simulator. Simulator platform maximum linear (angular) displacements were ensured according to the simulator platform mechanism dimension parameters. According to the actual movement signals of the simulated vehicle, the parameters of the washout algorithm were identified, the simulator driver movement sensations were determined, and human body movement sensation errors were defined as the simulation fidehty measurement standards. Based on the relationship between the structural parameters of the simulator platform and simulation fidelity of the simulator, an optimization method for the structural parameters of simulator platform oriented simulation fidelity was proposed. The proposed method is applied to the high speed locomotive driving simulator developed by us and the resuits demonstrate that the simulator platform movements with optimized structural parameters make better use of its workspace, and the simulator driver movement sensation error is decreased by 84.57 %, which means the simulation fidelity is greatly enhanced.
出处 《机械科学与技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期986-992,共7页 Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering
基金 牵引动力国家重点实验室开放课题项目(TPL0606)资助
关键词 仿真器平台 结构参数 优化设计 洗出算法 模拟逼真度 simulator platform structural parameters optimization design washout algorithm simulation fidelity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献54

共引文献87

同被引文献15

  • 1张伟,李红伟,马亚龙.仿真的逼真度需求[J].计算机仿真,2003,20(z1):144-146. 被引量:2
  • 2刘飞,杨明.分布式仿真逼真度研究[J].计算机仿真,2005,22(6):49-52. 被引量:11
  • 3黄安祥,潘志,陈宗基,李劲松.现代军机仿真逼真度的研究[J].系统仿真学报,2005,17(12):2858-2862. 被引量:5
  • 4Gross David C.Report from the fidelity implementation study group[C]//Proceedings of 1999 Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop,99S-SIW-167.Orlando,Florida,USA:Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization(SISO),1999:231-240.
  • 5Defense Modeling and Simulation Office.Department of Defense Verification,Validation,and Accreditation Recommended Practices Guide[M].Washington,USA:Defense Modeling and Simulation Office,2000:10-24.
  • 6Pace Dale K.Issues related to quantifying simulation validation[C]//Proceedings of 2001 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop,01F-SIW-050.Orlando,Florida,USA:Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization(SISO),2001:1-11.
  • 7Hess Ronald A,Marchesi Federico.Analytical assessment of flight simulator fidelity using pilot models[J].Journal of Guidance,Control,and Dynamics,2009,32(3):760-770.
  • 8Steurs Maarten,Mulder Max,van Paassen M M.A cybernetic approach to assess flight simulator fidelity[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit.Providence,Rhode Island,2004.
  • 9Bürki-Cohen Judith,Go Tiauw H,Chung William W,et al.Simulator fidelity requirements for airline pilot training and evaluation continued:An update on motion requirements research[C]//Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology.2003:182-189.
  • 10Longridge Thomas,Bürki-Cohen Judith,Go Tiauw H,et al.Simulator fidelity considerations for training and evaluation of today's airline pilots[C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology.Columbus,OH,2001.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部