摘要
自从我国制定并实施《反不正当竞争法》以来,竞争法学界更多地关注该法所规定的各种行为的法律适用及其第2条一般条款的运用问题,对于"经营者合法权益"的内涵并未给予高度重视。《反不正当竞争法》界定不正当竞争行为的概念时所指的"合法权益",在针对虚假广告等行为时,具体含义为何?我国各地法院在裁判不正当竞争案件时,或统称为合法权益、或表述为竞争优势等内容、或表述为竞争利益、或径称为公平竞争权。鉴于法益保护模式存在的缺陷,其与经营权、经营自主权、营业权等具有不同的内涵,有必要将此种法益上升为法定权利即公平竞争权。
Since the Law of the People's Republic of China against Unfair Competition was put into practice, the term 'legal rights and interests of the businesspeople' , which deserves more strict definition,has unfortunately never been paid enough attention to. What does 'legal rights and interests' in the Law refer to when dealing with cheating advertising? When the local courts deal with unfair competition cases, such terms as 'legal rights and interests' , 'competitive advantage', 'competitive interests', and 'fair competition right' are now and then employed. Due to the fact that the above terms are different from 'right for business management', 'decision-making right for business management' or 'right for business operation', it is necessary to define 'legal interests' as 'legal rights', that is 'right for fair competition' , so as to improve the protective function of the Law.
出处
《南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期54-66,共13页
Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
江苏省教育厅"青蓝工程"
