期刊文献+

High efficiency of heavy metal removal in mine water by limestone 被引量:2

High efficiency of heavy metal removal in mine water by limestone
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The removal of Cd, Cu, Ni and Zn from dilute mine water by using several geological materials including pure limestone, sand, carbonaceous limestone and brecciated limestone was performed on a laboratory scale. The results showed that to add geological materials in combination with sodium carbonate injection would notably enhance the efficiency of heavy metal removal to varying degrees. Pure limestone was found the best one among the four materials mentioned above for removing heavy metals from mine water. The removal efficiencies of pure limestone when it is ground as fine as 30–60 meshes are 58.6% for Cd, 100% for Cu, 47.8% for Ni, and 36.8% for Zn at 20℃. The optimum pH is about 8.9 to 9.1. The mechanism of higher effective removal, perhaps, is primarily due to co-precipitation under the control of calcite-related pH value. According to this research, Na2CO3 injection manners, including slug dosing and drip-wise, seemed to have little impact on the efficiency of heavy metal removal. The removal of Cd, Cu, Ni and Zn from dilute mine water by using several geological materials including pure limestone, sand, carbonaceous limestone and brecciated limestone was performed on a laboratory scale. The results showed that to add geological materials in combination with sodium carbonate injection would notably enhance the efficiency of heavy metal removal to varying degrees. Pure limestone was found the best one among the four materials mentioned above for removing heavy metals from mine water. The removal efficiencies of pure limestone when it is ground as fine as 30--60 meshes are 58.6% for Cd, 100% for Cu, 47.8% for Ni, and 36.8% for Zn at 20℃. The optimum pH is about 8.9 to 9.1. The mechanism of higher effective removal, perhaps, is primarily due to co-precipitation under the control of calcite-related pH value. According to this research, Na2CO3 injection manners, including slug dosing and drip-wise, seemed to have little impact on the efficiency of heavy metal removal.
出处 《Chinese Journal Of Geochemistry》 EI CAS 2009年第3期293-298,共6页 中国地球化学学报
基金 granted by the Science Foundation of China Postdoctors (No. 20070420214) the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (No. SJ08D03)
关键词 重金属 石灰石 高效率 矿水 地质资料 砾状灰岩 实验室规模 去除率 heavy metal removal mine water geochemical method limestone
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献18

共引文献45

同被引文献44

  • 1王立仙,马文丽,杨广怀,刘春生.铜在土壤中的淋溶迁移特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(4):21-24. 被引量:11
  • 2李晶晶,彭恩泽.综述铬在土壤和植物中的赋存形式及迁移规律[J].工业安全与环保,2005,31(3):31-33. 被引量:50
  • 3方利平,章明奎,陈美娜,黄昌勇.长三角和珠三角农业土壤中铅、铜、镉的化学形态与转化[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(4):39-41. 被引量:19
  • 4CHEN Jian-ming, LIU Run-qing, SUN Wei, QIU Guan-zhou. Effect of mineral processing wastewater on flotation of sulfide minerals [J]. Transactions of the Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2009, 19(2): 454-457.
  • 5RAO S R, FINCH J A. A review of water re-use in flotation [J]. Minerals Engineering, 1989, 2(1): 65-85.
  • 6RUBIO J, SOUZA M L, SMITH R W. Overview of flotation as a wastewater treatment technique [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2002, 15(3): 139-155.
  • 7DOYLE F M. Ion flotation-its potential for hydrometallurgical operations [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2003, 72(1/2/3/4): 387-399.
  • 8JOHNSON B B. Effect ofpH; temperature, and concentration on the adsorption of cadmium on goethite [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1990, 24(1): 112-118.
  • 9TISLER T, ZAGORC-KONCAN J, ROS M, COTMAN M. Biodegradation and toxicity of wastewater from industry producing mineral fibres for thermal insulation [J]. Chemosphere, 1999, 38(6): 1347-1352.
  • 10KASIA J M, DUNCAN J R, BURGESS J E. Biological removal of nitrogen species from metal-processing wastewater [J]. Water Sa, 2005, 31(3): 407-412.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部