期刊文献+

乳腺癌多学科一体化诊治模式的价值 被引量:4

Values of multi-disciplinary integrated diagnosis and treatment mode for breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨多学科一体化诊治模式在乳腺癌诊治中的价值。方法建立乳腺癌多学科一体化管理模式,对两年来诊治的275例患者(试验组)与成立多学科一体化管理模式之前收治的164例患者(对照组)的临床资料进行统计分析,比较住院时间、入院至确诊的时间、治疗费用、保乳率、化疗实际剂量与标准计量的百分比、内分泌治疗的实施率、依从率、流失率及满意率。结果试验组的保乳率、内分泌治疗率及实际化疗剂量与标准剂量的百分比均显著高于对照组(P值均<0.05),而住院时间、入院至确诊的时间却显著短于对照组(P值均<0.05),满意率、依从率、随访率显著高于对照组(P值均<0.05),流失率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组的人均治疗费用显著高于对照组(P<0.05),上升的费用主要用于高危患者;低危患者的人均治疗费用则显著下降(P<0.05),复诊次数也显著减少(P<0.05)。结论乳腺癌多学科一体化诊治模式可作为乳腺癌患者最适宜的诊治方案。 Objective To discuss the value of multi-disciplinary integrated diagnosis and treatment mode for breast Cancer. Methods A multi-disciplinary integrated diagnosis and treatment mode was established for breast cancer. Comparison was made between the 275 patients who were treated according to the established mode and 164 patients who received the traditional mode before establishment of the mode. The parameters included hospitalization time, definite diagnosis time, inpatient expenses, rate of breast conserving surgery, percentage of actual chemotherapy dose with standard, rate of endocrinotherapy, and patients' satisfaction level, compliance and loss. Results The rate of breast conserving surgery, rate of endecrinotherapy, and percentage of actual chemotherapy dose were significantly improved in the experimental group compared with the control group (P〈O. 05); and the hospitalization time and definite diagnosis time were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P〈O. 05);the compliance and satisfaction rate were significantly higher than those of the control group; the loss rate of patients was significantly lower than that of the control group(P〈0.05). The average expense of patients in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group ( P〈O. 05) ~ the increase of expense was mainly caused by critically ill patients. The expense of patients at lower risk was significantly decreased (P〈0.05). Conclusion The multi-disciplinary integrated diagnosis and treatment mode is an optimal strategy for breast cancer patients. (Shanghai Med J, 2009, 32 = 617-619)
出处 《上海医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第7期617-619,共3页 Shanghai Medical Journal
基金 上海市科委自然科学基金资助项目(06ZR14075)
关键词 乳腺癌 多学科 综合治疗 诊治模式 Breast cancer Multidisciplinary Comprehensive treatment Treatment model
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献49

共引文献119

同被引文献38

  • 1杜晶晶,石敏.骨科病人阶段性健康教育的效果评价[J].护理管理杂志,2005,5(10):8-9. 被引量:12
  • 2曹霖,汪晓东,李立.多学科协作诊治模式的会诊流程探讨(一)[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2007,14(3):343-345. 被引量:51
  • 3王颖,尹利华,毛莎,王红,孙丽平.对肝移植患者进行多学科护理查房的做法与效果[J].护理管理杂志,2007,7(11):41-42. 被引量:3
  • 4Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus [ J ]. Ann Surg; 1995, 222 ( 13 ): 339-350.
  • 5Buehwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta analysis[ J ]. JAMA, 2004, 292( 14 ): 1724-1737.
  • 6Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366( 17 ): 1567-1576.
  • 7Mingrone G, Panunzi S, de Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes [ J ~. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366( 1 ): 1577-1585.
  • 8Carlsson LM, Pehonen M, Ahlin S, et al. Bariatric surgery and prevention of type 2 diabetes in Swedish obese subjects[ J ].N Engl J Med, 2012, 367( 8 ): 695-704.
  • 9RubinoF.Is type 2 diabetes an operable intestinal disease?A provocative yet reasonable hypothesis [ J ]. Diabetes Care, 2008, 31 Suppl 2: $290-296.
  • 10Hoerger TJ, Zhang P, Segel JE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for severely obese adults with diabetes [ J ]. Diabetes Care, 2010, 33(9 ): 1933-1939.

引证文献4

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部