期刊文献+

3种会阴切口缝合方法效果的比较 被引量:11

3种会阴切口缝合方法效果的比较
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨3种不同缝合方法缝合会阴切口对产妇的影响。方法随机将760名产妇分成观察组255例、对照1组250例和对照2组255例。分别采取分层连续、传统法缝合和分层间断缝合3种方法缝合会阴切口。结果与对照1组和对照2组比较,观察组产妇伤口愈合率和术后性生活满意度高,线结反应低,差异具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论应用合成线分层连续缝合会阴切口,无线结反应,伤口疼痛轻,外表美观,不需拆线,产妇性生活满意度高。 Objective To explore the effect of different suture and closure methods of episiotomy suture on parturients. Methods 760 parturients with perineal incision were randomly divided into three groups with 255 cases in the observation group, 250 cases in the control group Ⅰ and 255 cases in the control group Ⅱ. The methods of episiotomy suture in the three groups were layer continuous method, suture of traditional method and layer interrupted suture method, respectively. Result Compared with the control group Ⅰ and the control group Ⅱ, the rate of wound healing and the sexual satisfaction degree after operation in the observation group were higher, and the lines reaction was lower (all P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Parturients with layer continuous line suturing episiotomy wounds had higher sexual satisfaction degree, lower pain in wounds and no lines reaction .
出处 《现代临床护理》 2009年第8期71-72,40,共3页 Modern Clinical Nursing
关键词 会阴切开术 缝合方法 间断缝合 连续缝合 perineal incision suture method interrupted suture continuous suture
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献8

共引文献135

同被引文献255

引证文献11

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部